[OWASP_PHPSEC] use of require_once

Minhaz A V minhazav at gmail.com
Tue Jul 30 10:08:45 UTC 2013


will it be changed to *require * after autoloading is done?


On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Minhaz A V <minhazav at gmail.com> wrote:

> Can I know how will autoloading be accomplished and what it exactly means?
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Sven Rautenberg <sven at rtbg.de> wrote:
>
>> It's probably because of the current lack of autoloading, but I think
>> this will be addressed.
>>
>>
>>
>> Minhaz A V <minhazav at gmail.com> schrieb:
>>>
>>>  while going through the codes I found the use of require_once at many
>>> places
>>> why isn't *require * being used, when *require_once * has computational
>>> overheads, it consumes more memory and is slower
>>>
>>> reference:
>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/186338/why-is-require-once-so-bad-to-use
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> OWASP_PHP_Security_Project mailing list
>>> OWASP_PHP_Security_Project at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp_php_security_project
>>>
>>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Sven
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp_php_security_project/attachments/20130730/ebd4f162/attachment.html>


More information about the OWASP_PHP_Security_Project mailing list