[OWASP-wiki-editors] New Tag

Neil Smithline neil.smithline at owasp.org
Mon Aug 25 19:12:35 UTC 2014


Me too. But I know that the simple form is possible and easy to implement.
But I definitely think more is better.


Neil Smithline
408-634-5764
http://www.neilsmithline.com


On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:

>  If possible I'd like to see reviewed|<date-of-review> if possible.
>
> Aloha,
> Jim
>
>
> On 8/24/14, 6:42 PM, Neil Smithline wrote:
>
> Does a simple reviewed/2014 category work?
> On Aug 24, 2014 5:51 PM, "Torsten Gigler" <torsten.gigler at owasp.org>
> wrote:
>
>>  Hi,
>>
>> for (1) you can use now
>>  {{taggedDocument | type=design  }}
>>
>> at the top of the page; This looks like (with a special yellow and green
>> background color):
>>  This Page is up to date, but it may need a nicer design! Please help
>> OWASP to FixME <https://owasp.org/index.php/Category:FIXME>.
>>
>> If you add the Parameter '| mode=silent', the Page is only silently added
>> to Category:FIXME/design
>> <https://owasp.org/index.php/Category:FIXME/design>
>> Does this suit your needs?
>>
>>
>> (2) Do you have any suggestions for the name and the description for
>> denoting a page was reviewed on a certain date (and when it should be
>> riviewed the next time). Do we need a new Template, or should we use the
>> 'taggedDocument'?
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Torsten
>>
>> Am 20.08.2014 um 00:25 schrieb Torsten Gigler:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> I am right back from my holidays ;-)
>> I'll be happy to do this extensions.
>>
>> 1) Do you have any suggestions for the name and text of the Tag? (like:
>> tag=redesign / The content of this page is OK, but the design should be
>> improved).
>>     Should the tag be recommended to use in 'silent' mode like Example 4
>> in https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Template:TaggedDocument or
>> highlighted in yellow?
>> 2) Should it be a new Template with a new Category, or could we use the
>> Template TaggedDocument (with a new subcategory of FIXME or a completely
>> new category for this? Any suggestions for the name and the description
>> (like Tag=validUntil, nextReview, bestBefore...)
>> If possible, we should try to get some Sub(-sub)categories automatically
>> generated by the date.
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Torsten
>>
>> Am 19.08.2014 um 01:56 schrieb Jim Manico:
>>
>> Agreed. The first few edit passes of the "top 100" pages went very well,
>> but this will not scale unless we have a review stamp somehow. I do not
>> want to add a big yellow blurb on all of the popular pages stating that we
>> reviewed it, so perhaps we should make it subtle and at the bottom of these
>> pages?
>>
>> Aloha,
>> Jim
>>
>>
>> On 8/18/14, 1:53 PM, Neil Smithline wrote:
>>
>> Must have number 2. Needed for workflow.
>> On Aug 18, 2014 7:49 PM, "Jim Manico" <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Torsten,
>>>
>>> Would you mind adding two more elements to the Tagging system?
>>>
>>> 1) A FixMe category to denote that a page may need better design, but
>>> the content is ok.
>>> 2) A new category to denote a page was reviewed on a certain date (even
>>> if it was not edited).
>>>
>>> Is this acceptable and reasonable to you, Torsten?
>>>
>>> Aloha,
>>> Jim
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-wiki-editors/attachments/20140825/95b2c5b2/attachment.html>


More information about the OWASP-wiki-editors mailing list