[OWASP-wiki-editors] New Tag

Jim Manico jim.manico at owasp.org
Mon Aug 25 15:54:45 UTC 2014


If possible I'd like to see reviewed|<date-of-review> if possible.

Aloha,
Jim

On 8/24/14, 6:42 PM, Neil Smithline wrote:
>
> Does a simple reviewed/2014 category work?
>
> On Aug 24, 2014 5:51 PM, "Torsten Gigler" <torsten.gigler at owasp.org 
> <mailto:torsten.gigler at owasp.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     for (1) you can use now
>
>         {{taggedDocument
>
>             | type=design 
>
>         }} 
>
>     at the top of the page; This looks like (with a special yellow and
>     green background color):
>
>     This Page is up to date, but it may need a nicer design! Please
>     help OWASP to FixME <https://owasp.org/index.php/Category:FIXME>.
>
>     If you add the Parameter '| mode=silent', the Page is only
>     silently added to Category:FIXME/design
>     <https://owasp.org/index.php/Category:FIXME/design>
>     Does this suit your needs?
>
>
>     (2) Do you have any suggestions for the name and the description
>     for denoting a page was reviewed on a certain date (and when it
>     should be riviewed the next time). Do we need a new Template, or
>     should we use the 'taggedDocument'?
>
>     Kind regards
>     Torsten
>
>
>     Am 20.08.2014 um 00:25 schrieb Torsten Gigler:
>>     Hi Jim,
>>
>>     I am right back from my holidays ;-)
>>     I'll be happy to do this extensions.
>>
>>     1) Do you have any suggestions for the name and text of the Tag?
>>     (like: tag=redesign / The content of this page is OK, but the
>>     design should be improved).
>>         Should the tag be recommended to use in 'silent' mode like
>>     Example 4 in
>>     https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Template:TaggedDocument or
>>     highlighted in yellow?
>>     2) Should it be a new Template with a new Category, or could we
>>     use the Template TaggedDocument (with a new subcategory of FIXME
>>     or a completely new category for this? Any suggestions for the
>>     name and the description (like Tag=validUntil, nextReview,
>>     bestBefore...)
>>     If possible, we should try to get some Sub(-sub)categories
>>     automatically generated by the date.
>>
>>     Kind regards
>>     Torsten
>>
>>     Am 19.08.2014 um 01:56 schrieb Jim Manico:
>>>     Agreed. The first few edit passes of the "top 100" pages went
>>>     very well, but this will not scale unless we have a review stamp
>>>     somehow. I do not want to add a big yellow blurb on all of the
>>>     popular pages stating that we reviewed it, so perhaps we should
>>>     make it subtle and at the bottom of these pages?
>>>
>>>     Aloha,
>>>     Jim
>>>
>>>
>>>     On 8/18/14, 1:53 PM, Neil Smithline wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Must have number 2. Needed for workflow.
>>>>
>>>>     On Aug 18, 2014 7:49 PM, "Jim Manico" <jim.manico at owasp.org
>>>>     <mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         Torsten,
>>>>
>>>>         Would you mind adding two more elements to the Tagging system?
>>>>
>>>>         1) A FixMe category to denote that a page may need better
>>>>         design, but the content is ok.
>>>>         2) A new category to denote a page was reviewed on a
>>>>         certain date (even if it was not edited).
>>>>
>>>>         Is this acceptable and reasonable to you, Torsten?
>>>>
>>>>         Aloha,
>>>>         Jim
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-wiki-editors/attachments/20140825/007ee79b/attachment.html>


More information about the OWASP-wiki-editors mailing list