[OWASP-wiki-editors] New Tag
jim.manico at owasp.org
Mon Aug 25 15:54:45 UTC 2014
If possible I'd like to see reviewed|<date-of-review> if possible.
On 8/24/14, 6:42 PM, Neil Smithline wrote:
> Does a simple reviewed/2014 category work?
> On Aug 24, 2014 5:51 PM, "Torsten Gigler" <torsten.gigler at owasp.org
> <mailto:torsten.gigler at owasp.org>> wrote:
> for (1) you can use now
> | type=design
> at the top of the page; This looks like (with a special yellow and
> green background color):
> This Page is up to date, but it may need a nicer design! Please
> help OWASP to FixME <https://owasp.org/index.php/Category:FIXME>.
> If you add the Parameter '| mode=silent', the Page is only
> silently added to Category:FIXME/design
> Does this suit your needs?
> (2) Do you have any suggestions for the name and the description
> for denoting a page was reviewed on a certain date (and when it
> should be riviewed the next time). Do we need a new Template, or
> should we use the 'taggedDocument'?
> Kind regards
> Am 20.08.2014 um 00:25 schrieb Torsten Gigler:
>> Hi Jim,
>> I am right back from my holidays ;-)
>> I'll be happy to do this extensions.
>> 1) Do you have any suggestions for the name and text of the Tag?
>> (like: tag=redesign / The content of this page is OK, but the
>> design should be improved).
>> Should the tag be recommended to use in 'silent' mode like
>> Example 4 in
>> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Template:TaggedDocument or
>> highlighted in yellow?
>> 2) Should it be a new Template with a new Category, or could we
>> use the Template TaggedDocument (with a new subcategory of FIXME
>> or a completely new category for this? Any suggestions for the
>> name and the description (like Tag=validUntil, nextReview,
>> If possible, we should try to get some Sub(-sub)categories
>> automatically generated by the date.
>> Kind regards
>> Am 19.08.2014 um 01:56 schrieb Jim Manico:
>>> Agreed. The first few edit passes of the "top 100" pages went
>>> very well, but this will not scale unless we have a review stamp
>>> somehow. I do not want to add a big yellow blurb on all of the
>>> popular pages stating that we reviewed it, so perhaps we should
>>> make it subtle and at the bottom of these pages?
>>> On 8/18/14, 1:53 PM, Neil Smithline wrote:
>>>> Must have number 2. Needed for workflow.
>>>> On Aug 18, 2014 7:49 PM, "Jim Manico" <jim.manico at owasp.org
>>>> <mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>>> Would you mind adding two more elements to the Tagging system?
>>>> 1) A FixMe category to denote that a page may need better
>>>> design, but the content is ok.
>>>> 2) A new category to denote a page was reviewed on a
>>>> certain date (even if it was not edited).
>>>> Is this acceptable and reasonable to you, Torsten?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OWASP-wiki-editors