[OWASP-wiki-editors] New Tag

Neil Smithline neil.smithline at owasp.org
Sun Aug 24 22:42:15 UTC 2014


Does a simple reviewed/2014 category work?
On Aug 24, 2014 5:51 PM, "Torsten Gigler" <torsten.gigler at owasp.org> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
> for (1) you can use now
>  {{taggedDocument | type=design  }}
>
> at the top of the page; This looks like (with a special yellow and green
> background color):
>  This Page is up to date, but it may need a nicer design! Please help
> OWASP to FixME <https://owasp.org/index.php/Category:FIXME>.
>
> If you add the Parameter '| mode=silent', the Page is only silently added
> to Category:FIXME/design
> <https://owasp.org/index.php/Category:FIXME/design>
> Does this suit your needs?
>
>
> (2) Do you have any suggestions for the name and the description for
> denoting a page was reviewed on a certain date (and when it should be
> riviewed the next time). Do we need a new Template, or should we use the
> 'taggedDocument'?
>
> Kind regards
> Torsten
>
> Am 20.08.2014 um 00:25 schrieb Torsten Gigler:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> I am right back from my holidays ;-)
> I'll be happy to do this extensions.
>
> 1) Do you have any suggestions for the name and text of the Tag? (like:
> tag=redesign / The content of this page is OK, but the design should be
> improved).
>     Should the tag be recommended to use in 'silent' mode like Example 4
> in https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Template:TaggedDocument or highlighted
> in yellow?
> 2) Should it be a new Template with a new Category, or could we use the
> Template TaggedDocument (with a new subcategory of FIXME or a completely
> new category for this? Any suggestions for the name and the description
> (like Tag=validUntil, nextReview, bestBefore...)
> If possible, we should try to get some Sub(-sub)categories automatically
> generated by the date.
>
> Kind regards
> Torsten
>
> Am 19.08.2014 um 01:56 schrieb Jim Manico:
>
> Agreed. The first few edit passes of the "top 100" pages went very well,
> but this will not scale unless we have a review stamp somehow. I do not
> want to add a big yellow blurb on all of the popular pages stating that we
> reviewed it, so perhaps we should make it subtle and at the bottom of these
> pages?
>
> Aloha,
> Jim
>
>
> On 8/18/14, 1:53 PM, Neil Smithline wrote:
>
> Must have number 2. Needed for workflow.
> On Aug 18, 2014 7:49 PM, "Jim Manico" <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> Torsten,
>>
>> Would you mind adding two more elements to the Tagging system?
>>
>> 1) A FixMe category to denote that a page may need better design, but the
>> content is ok.
>> 2) A new category to denote a page was reviewed on a certain date (even
>> if it was not edited).
>>
>> Is this acceptable and reasonable to you, Torsten?
>>
>> Aloha,
>> Jim
>>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-wiki-editors/attachments/20140824/a464644a/attachment.html>


More information about the OWASP-wiki-editors mailing list