[OWASP-wiki-editors] New Tag

Sun Aug 24 21:51:18 UTC 2014

Hi,

for (1) you can use now

    {{taggedDocument

        | type=design 

    }} 

at the top of the page; This looks like (with a special yellow and green 
background color):

This Page is up to date, but it may need a nicer design! Please help 
OWASP to FixME <https://owasp.org/index.php/Category:FIXME>.

If you add the Parameter '| mode=silent', the Page is only silently 
added to Category:FIXME/design 
<https://owasp.org/index.php/Category:FIXME/design>
Does this suit your needs?

(2) Do you have any suggestions for the name and the description for 
denoting a page was reviewed on a certain date (and when it should be 
riviewed the next time). Do we need a new Template, or should we use the 
'taggedDocument'?

Kind regards
Torsten

Am 20.08.2014 um 00:25 schrieb Torsten Gigler:
> Hi Jim,
>
> I am right back from my holidays ;-)
> I'll be happy to do this extensions.
>
> 1) Do you have any suggestions for the name and text of the Tag? 
> (like: tag=redesign / The content of this page is OK, but the design 
> should be improved).
>     Should the tag be recommended to use in 'silent' mode like Example 
> 4 in https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Template:TaggedDocument or 
> highlighted in yellow?
> 2) Should it be a new Template with a new Category, or could we use 
> the Template TaggedDocument (with a new subcategory of FIXME or a 
> completely new category for this? Any suggestions for the name and the 
> description (like Tag=validUntil, nextReview, bestBefore...)
> If possible, we should try to get some Sub(-sub)categories 
> automatically generated by the date.
>
> Kind regards
> Torsten
>
> Am 19.08.2014 um 01:56 schrieb Jim Manico:
>> Agreed. The first few edit passes of the "top 100" pages went very 
>> well, but this will not scale unless we have a review stamp somehow. 
>> I do not want to add a big yellow blurb on all of the popular pages 
>> stating that we reviewed it, so perhaps we should make it subtle and 
>> at the bottom of these pages?
>>
>> Aloha,
>> Jim
>>
>>
>> On 8/18/14, 1:53 PM, Neil Smithline wrote:
>>>
>>> Must have number 2. Needed for workflow.
>>>
>>> On Aug 18, 2014 7:49 PM, "Jim Manico" <jim.manico at owasp.org 
>>> <mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Torsten,
>>>
>>>     Would you mind adding two more elements to the Tagging system?
>>>
>>>     1) A FixMe category to denote that a page may need better
>>>     design, but the content is ok.
>>>     2) A new category to denote a page was reviewed on a certain
>>>     date (even if it was not edited).
>>>
>>>     Is this acceptable and reasonable to you, Torsten?
>>>
>>>     Aloha,
>>>     Jim
>>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-wiki-editors/attachments/20140824/515ee00f/attachment.html>