[OWASP-wiki-editors] New Tag
torsten.gigler at owasp.org
Sun Aug 24 21:51:18 UTC 2014
for (1) you can use now
at the top of the page; This looks like (with a special yellow and green
This Page is up to date, but it may need a nicer design! Please help
OWASP to FixME <https://owasp.org/index.php/Category:FIXME>.
If you add the Parameter '| mode=silent', the Page is only silently
added to Category:FIXME/design
Does this suit your needs?
(2) Do you have any suggestions for the name and the description for
denoting a page was reviewed on a certain date (and when it should be
riviewed the next time). Do we need a new Template, or should we use the
Am 20.08.2014 um 00:25 schrieb Torsten Gigler:
> Hi Jim,
> I am right back from my holidays ;-)
> I'll be happy to do this extensions.
> 1) Do you have any suggestions for the name and text of the Tag?
> (like: tag=redesign / The content of this page is OK, but the design
> should be improved).
> Should the tag be recommended to use in 'silent' mode like Example
> 4 in https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Template:TaggedDocument or
> highlighted in yellow?
> 2) Should it be a new Template with a new Category, or could we use
> the Template TaggedDocument (with a new subcategory of FIXME or a
> completely new category for this? Any suggestions for the name and the
> description (like Tag=validUntil, nextReview, bestBefore...)
> If possible, we should try to get some Sub(-sub)categories
> automatically generated by the date.
> Kind regards
> Am 19.08.2014 um 01:56 schrieb Jim Manico:
>> Agreed. The first few edit passes of the "top 100" pages went very
>> well, but this will not scale unless we have a review stamp somehow.
>> I do not want to add a big yellow blurb on all of the popular pages
>> stating that we reviewed it, so perhaps we should make it subtle and
>> at the bottom of these pages?
>> On 8/18/14, 1:53 PM, Neil Smithline wrote:
>>> Must have number 2. Needed for workflow.
>>> On Aug 18, 2014 7:49 PM, "Jim Manico" <jim.manico at owasp.org
>>> <mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>> Would you mind adding two more elements to the Tagging system?
>>> 1) A FixMe category to denote that a page may need better
>>> design, but the content is ok.
>>> 2) A new category to denote a page was reviewed on a certain
>>> date (even if it was not edited).
>>> Is this acceptable and reasonable to you, Torsten?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OWASP-wiki-editors