[OWASP-wiki-editors] New Tag

Jim Manico jim.manico at owasp.org
Mon Aug 18 23:56:56 UTC 2014

Agreed. The first few edit passes of the "top 100" pages went very well, 
but this will not scale unless we have a review stamp somehow. I do not 
want to add a big yellow blurb on all of the popular pages stating that 
we reviewed it, so perhaps we should make it subtle and at the bottom of 
these pages?


On 8/18/14, 1:53 PM, Neil Smithline wrote:
> Must have number 2. Needed for workflow.
> On Aug 18, 2014 7:49 PM, "Jim Manico" <jim.manico at owasp.org 
> <mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org>> wrote:
>     Torsten,
>     Would you mind adding two more elements to the Tagging system?
>     1) A FixMe category to denote that a page may need better design,
>     but the content is ok.
>     2) A new category to denote a page was reviewed on a certain date
>     (even if it was not edited).
>     Is this acceptable and reasonable to you, Torsten?
>     Aloha,
>     Jim

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-wiki-editors/attachments/20140818/00ed87fb/attachment.html>

More information about the OWASP-wiki-editors mailing list