[Owasp-topten] Who Are the Initial Six Sampled?

Dave Wichers dave.wichers at owasp.org
Fri May 24 13:58:33 UTC 2013


That is correct.

-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Heinrich [mailto:christian.heinrich at cmlh.id.au] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 12:42 AM
To: Dave Wichers
Cc: owasp-topten at lists.owasp.org
Subject: Who Are the Initial Six Sampled?

Dave,

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Dave Wichers <dave.wichers at owasp.org>
wrote:
> So, I expanded from 4 sources of input to 7, but one of those dropped 
> out (MITRE as they said they wouldn't have good stats to provide) so 
> then it was 6. And HP is really two of the providers as they provided 
> WebInspect results, and separately Fortify results. So results for two 
> very different tools, but only 1 vendor.

>From sampling https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Top_10_2010-Introduction
and based on the statement above from
http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-topten/2013-January/000828.html
I will assume that on 29 Jan that the six sources chosen were:

1. Aspect
2  HP (Fortify) i.e.
http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-topten/2013-January/000828.html
3. HP (WebInspect) i.e.
http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-topten/2013-January/000828.html
4. Softtek i.e. https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Top_10_2010-Introduction
5. Veracode i.e.
http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-topten/2013-January/000813.html
6. Whitehat i.e.
http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-topten/2013-January/000813.html

Can you please let me know if this is correct or where I am wrong?


--
Regards,
Christian Heinrich

http://cmlh.id.au/contact



More information about the Owasp-topten mailing list