[Owasp-topten] Who Are the Initial Six Sampled?

Christian Heinrich christian.heinrich at cmlh.id.au
Fri May 24 04:42:18 UTC 2013


Dave,

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Dave Wichers <dave.wichers at owasp.org> wrote:
> So, I expanded from 4 sources of input to 7, but one of those dropped out
> (MITRE as they said they wouldn’t have good stats to provide) so then it was
> 6. And HP is really two of the providers as they provided WebInspect
> results, and separately Fortify results. So results for two very different
> tools, but only 1 vendor.

>From sampling https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Top_10_2010-Introduction
and based on the statement above from
http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-topten/2013-January/000828.html
I will assume that on 29 Jan that the six sources chosen were:

1. Aspect
2  HP (Fortify) i.e.
http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-topten/2013-January/000828.html
3. HP (WebInspect) i.e.
http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-topten/2013-January/000828.html
4. Softtek i.e. https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Top_10_2010-Introduction
5. Veracode i.e.
http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-topten/2013-January/000813.html
6. Whitehat i.e.
http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-topten/2013-January/000813.html

Can you please let me know if this is correct or where I am wrong?


-- 
Regards,
Christian Heinrich

http://cmlh.id.au/contact


More information about the Owasp-topten mailing list