[Owasp-testing] Testing Guide V4 - Start up
psiinon at gmail.com
Fri Aug 31 07:56:11 UTC 2012
I think its right for us to suggest an open source tool (or tools) for
using in each section, however I dont think we should view this as a ZAP vs
We want to suggest the best possible tool, but I also think that its
reasonable for us to *prefer *OWASP ones.
But we should also favour tools that are more mature and/or more frequently
For OWASP tools I think we can rely on the new classifications: Flagship,
Labs, Incubator, Archive.
So I think its really a sliding scale.
If theres a Flagship OWASP project that is great at finding a specific type
of vulnerability then we should definitely use that as the example.
If not then we have to balance how relevant that tool is likely to remain.
A brand new Incubator project might be great in one specific case, but may
also not really be in a fit state for most people to use, or the project
may quickly wither and die.
And if a well regarded non OWASP open source tool is the best option then
we should use that.
Going back to ZAP, I obviously hope it will be the ideal tool in many cases
And helping to establish if this is the case and explaining exactly how ZAP
can be used may be the most effective way I can contribute to this guide.
But I also want to use this process to learn where ZAP's weaknesses are.
And depending on how long it takes to produce the guide we (the ZAP
developers) may be able to enhance specific areas of ZAP as the work on the
So please let me know asap if/when you work on an area of the guide that
you dont think ZAP is effective in helping with, or if you would like
advice and guidance on how to use ZAP as effectively as possible.
Simon (ZAP Project Lead)
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Matteo Meucci <matteo.meucci at owasp.org>wrote:
> I've updated the wiki, thanks!
> On 08/30/2012 11:15 PM, Amro wrote:
> > Thanks Mat,
> > Please assign this task to me and I will make sure that our tool sets
> are updated.
> > Regards,
> > Amro
> > Sent from BlackBerry®. Excuse typo's and brevity.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Matteo Meucci <matteo.meucci at owasp.org>
> > Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:11:41
> > To: <amro at owasp.org>
> > Cc: <owasp-testing-bounces at lists.owasp.org>; <
> owasp-testing at lists.owasp.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Owasp-testing] Testing Guide V4 - Start up
> > Hi Amro,
> > good question related to the tools. Here we have to update many
> > Usually at the end of each article we suggest to use a particular open
> > source tool to perform the test. I think we can use and suggest both the
> > tools in many situations.
> > Also the Appendix A "Testing Tools" should pick all the testing tools
> > cited in the Testing Guide and give more details.
> > Thanks,
> > Mat
> > On 08/30/2012 10:58 PM, Amro wrote:
> >> Please count me in as well .. Are we gonna use ZAP instead of WebScarab
> in the new version?
> >> Regards,
> >> Amro
> >> Sent from BlackBerry®. Excuse typo's and brevity.
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Matteo Meucci <matteo.meucci at owasp.org>
> >> Sender: owasp-testing-bounces at lists.owasp.org
> >> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:40:29
> >> To: <owasp-testing at lists.owasp.org>
> >> Subject: [Owasp-testing] Testing Guide V4 - Start up
> >> Hi all Testing Guide contributors.
> >> Testing Guide v4 has been approved as Projects Reboot 2012!
> >> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Projects_Reboot_2012
> >> Here is the list of contributors I've collected:
> >> Pavol Luptak
> >> Marco Morana
> >> Giorgio Fedon
> >> Stefano Di Paola
> >> Gianrico Ingrosso
> >> Giuseppe Bonfà
> >> Roberto Suggi Liverani
> >> Robert Smith
> >> Andrew Muller
> >> Robert Winkel
> >> tripurari rai
> >> Thomas Ryan
> >> tim bertels
> >> Cecil Su
> >> Aung KhAnt
> >> Norbert Szetei
> >> michael.boman
> >> Wagner Elias
> >> Kevin Horvat
> >> Juan Galiana Lara
> >> Kenan Gursoy
> >> Jason Flood
> >> Javier Marcos de Prado
> >> Sumit Siddharth
> >> Mike Hryekewicz
> >> psiinon
> >> Ray Schippers
> >> Raul Siles
> >> Jayanta Karmakar
> >> Brad Causey
> >> Vicente Aguilera
> >> Ismael Gonçalves
> >> Reviewers team:
> >> Paolo Perego
> >> Daniel Cuthbert
> >> Matthew Churcher
> >> Lode Vanstechelman
> >> Sebastien Gioria
> >> Introduction and Project purpose for v4:
> >> ============================ =============
> >> The OWASP Testing Guide v3 includes a "best practice" penetration
> >> testing framework which users can implement in their own organizations
> >> and a "low level" penetration testing guide that describes techniques
> >> for testing most common web application and web service security
> >> issues. Nowadays the Testing Guide has become the standard to perform
> >> a Web Application Penetration Testing and many Companies all around
> >> the world have adopted it.
> >> It is vital for the project mantaining an updated project that
> >> represents the state of the art for WebAppSec.
> >> Project Roadmap
> >> =============
> >> - (1) 1st phase: Brainstorming and create a new table of contents
> >> Objective: creating a new table of contents of the OTGv4
> >> assigning a task for each contributor.
> >> I created a new OWASP Testing Guide v4 table of Contents here:
> >> - (2) 2nd phase: Writing
> >> 20th September 2012: Start writing the articles
> >> 1st November 2012: 1st Draft
> >> 30th November: end of writing phase
> >> - (3) 3rd phase: Reviewing
> >> - 1st December 2012: Starting the review phase,
> >> - 15th December 2012: Create the RC1,
> >> - 31st January 2013: Release the version 4.
> >> Timeline November 2012 1st Draft, January 2013 Final Release
> >> So, let's start discussion about phase (1)!
> >> Thanks!
> >> Mat
> >> --
> >> Matteo Meucci
> >> OWASP Testing Guide Lead
> >> OWASP-Italy President
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Owasp-testing mailing list
> >> Owasp-testing at lists.owasp.org
> >> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-testing
> Matteo Meucci
> OWASP Testing Guide Lead
> OWASP Italy President
> Owasp-testing mailing list
> Owasp-testing at lists.owasp.org
OWASP ZAP: Toolsmith Tool of the Year
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-testing