[Owasp-testing] Add new tools

Dave van Stein dvstein at gmail.com
Mon Sep 21 07:56:26 EDT 2009


The criteria to be listed are already discussed and will be presented on the
project wiki soon.

We have chosen to include both commercial and open source tools to be as
unbiased as possible.

Therefor we will include all the listed below license types.

regards, dave

2009/9/21 Michael Boman <michael.boman at omegapoint.se>

>  I would rate tools licenses in the following order:
>
>    1. Open source
>    2. Free to use (for everyone)
>    3. Free to use (non-commercial only)
>    4. Commercial
>
> I would be stop the listing inclusion after the 2nd point. IMHO it is not
> in the projects best intrerest to talk about tools that is not available to
> everyone - your organisation type or your financial status is a fairly large
> limiting factor.
>
> Just my $.02...
>
> Best regards
> Michael Boman
>
> ------------------------------
> *Från:* owasp-testing-bounces at lists.owasp.org genom Pavol Luptak
> *Skickat:* sö 2009-09-20 23:11
> *Till:* dinis cruz
> *Kopia:* Paulo Coimbra; owasp-testing at lists.owasp.org
> *Ämne:* Re: [Owasp-testing] Add new tools
>
>   On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:05:12PM +0100, dinis cruz wrote:
> >    This information on tools is valuable to our community, the challenge
> is
> >    to do it in a way that we keep our 'vendor independence'
>
> For this reason I think we should distinguish between opensource and
> commercial
> tools (maybe prefer opensource tools).
>
> Pavol
> --
> Pavol Luptak, CISSP, CEH
> OWASP Slovakia chapter leader
> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Slovakia
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-testing mailing list
> Owasp-testing at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-testing
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-testing/attachments/20090921/0f1e6dc1/attachment.html 


More information about the Owasp-testing mailing list