[Owasp-testing] Updated Index draft
rick.mitchell at bell.ca
rick.mitchell at bell.ca
Mon Jun 9 11:52:10 EDT 2008
Hi Kevin & everyone,
A few things come to mind, none of which are specific to Kevin's
article.
1) I'd suggest we don't use "and/or" is looks indecisive/quick/messy.
I've got an illustrative example here if you care to take a look:
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/User:Rick.mitchell#.22and.2For.22_Explan
ation
2) We need to come up with a standard for section naming conventions
(this isn't unique to your article). wikipedia suggests only leading
caps however I think the overall plan here is to publish this as a *.doc
and *.pdf once complete so I suggest full title caps.
3) I suggest we add some sort of tag to the index page
(https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Testing_Guide_v3_Table_of_Content
s) similar to the "(new)" and "(toimp)" tags to indicate when sections
are ready to be reviewed. Perhaps (100), (toreview), or (reviewpls).
4) I agree we should attempt to write in the third person (as has been
discussed already).
5) If we're going to use slang terms like "automagically" we should
agree on a formatting scheme (unerline, italics, quoted, or whatever).
Other than that the article is in good shape. I made some minor edits
which you can see via the following diff:
https://www.owasp.org/index.php?title=Testing%3A_Identify_application_en
try_points&diff=30882&oldid=30711
Rick
More information about the Owasp-testing
mailing list