[Owasp-testing] Updated Index draft

rick.mitchell at bell.ca rick.mitchell at bell.ca
Mon Jun 9 11:52:10 EDT 2008

Hi Kevin & everyone,

A few things come to mind, none of which are specific to Kevin's

1) I'd suggest we don't use "and/or" is looks indecisive/quick/messy.
I've got an illustrative example here if you care to take a look:

2) We need to come up with a standard for section naming conventions
(this isn't unique to your article). wikipedia suggests only leading
caps however I think the overall plan here is to publish this as a *.doc
and *.pdf once complete so I suggest full title caps.

3) I suggest we add some sort of tag to the index page
s) similar to the "(new)" and "(toimp)" tags to indicate when sections
are ready to be reviewed. Perhaps (100), (toreview), or (reviewpls).

4) I agree we should attempt to write in the third person (as has been
discussed already).

5) If we're going to use slang terms like "automagically" we should
agree on a formatting scheme (unerline, italics, quoted, or whatever).

Other than that the article is in good shape. I made some minor edits
which you can see via the following diff:


More information about the Owasp-testing mailing list