[Owasp-testing] Article content
matteo.meucci at gmail.com
Thu Oct 12 10:21:23 EDT 2006
Eoin is right. We don't need to write down all the theory about a
particular attack, but just a brief description. The added value of
this guide is our experience on how to test. Focus on real
case-studies will be great. IMHO this concept has to be our guideline
in writing new articles.
Other feed back?
On 10/12/06, Eoin <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
> when doing these articles can we ensure that the articles are practical and
> I.e. Examples of the test discussed and less academic theory.
> Just that, there are many books out there on the "theory" but what we need
> is examples of "how to test"..
> What do y'all think?
> Eoin Keary OWASP - Ireland
OWASP-Italy Chair, CISSP, CISA
mail: matteo.meucci at owasp.org
More information about the Owasp-testing