[Owasp-Summit-2011] Survey Invitation

Brad Causey bradcausey at owasp.org
Fri Sep 24 08:47:04 EDT 2010


I'm in.
-Brad Causey
CISSP, MCSE, C|EH, CIFI, CGSP

http://www.owasp.org
--
"Si vis pacem, para bellum"
--


On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Jason Li <jason.li at owasp.org> wrote:

> I think Brad's suggestion was to have separate surveys for the two groups.
>
> We just need to determine who are the current members of the Summit
> Committee and Global Committees.
>
> Is the list here accurate:
> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Global_Committee_Pages ?
>
> If we can get all the committee/board members to fill out the quick Doodle
> this week, we can use that to feed into Brad's kwiksurvey and send it
> out after the Oct 4th deadline from Lorna's CFP rolls around.
>
> Sound like a good plan?
>
> -Jason
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:41 PM, dinis cruz <dinis.cruz at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> Yes let's first find the dates that the Majority of the Board and
>> Committees can make it.
>>
>> On the Survey, are we also including details about who is filling out the
>> form?
>>
>> Dinis
>>
>> On 24 Sep 2010, at 03:34, Jason Li <jason.li at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>> First off, let me just say that by all means, if I'm treading on ground
>> that's already been covered previously - just let me know - I'm late to the
>> party on this one :)
>>
>> I agree that we want all leaders that can come to attend.
>>
>> But the impression I got from the call on Tuesday was that at minimum,
>> we're trying to get the Board and Global Committee members together. So it
>> seems like we should find the times that work best for the small set of
>> 25-35 of us and then take those times and present them to the leaders to
>> poll.
>>
>> Just as an extreme hypothetical example, it doesn't really work if the
>> consensus from the leaders ends up being one certain week if 3/4 of the
>> board and half of the Global Committee members can't make it.
>>
>> Just my $0.02 - which is worth increasingly less over in Europe :)
>>
>> -Jason
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Brad Causey < <bradcausey at owasp.org>
>> bradcausey at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I believe that we want to send the survey to all leaders, because we
>>> would want them to come, if they can find sponsorship or afford it
>>> personally.
>>>
>>>
>>> -Brad Causey
>>> CISSP, MCSE, C|EH, CIFI, CGSP
>>>
>>> <http://www.owasp.org>http://www.owasp.org
>>> --
>>> "Si vis pacem, para bellum"
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Jason Li <[email protected] <http://owasp.org>
>>> owasp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mini-link looks like the best option to me:
>>>> <https://www.kwiksurveys.com/?s=HJKOJK_9cc1431c>
>>>> https://www.kwiksurveys.com?s=HJKOJK_9cc1431c
>>>>
>>>> I agree with Lorna - we should ask for multiple week options.
>>>>
>>>> I assume we're talking about just the Board, Global Committees, and
>>>> Summit Committee for the moment? Or is this survey meant to go out to all
>>>> OWASP leaders?
>>>>
>>>> Depending on the number of people involved, it may actually be better to
>>>> compile the weeks people *can't* make as that will quickly rule out certain
>>>> dates if too many people can't make them.  (I for one can't do Jan 17th or
>>>> 24th).
>>>>
>>>> Just MHO.
>>>>
>>>> -Jason
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Brad Causey < <bradcausey at owasp.org>
>>>> bradcausey at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, Lorna, we can easily do that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Brad Causey
>>>>> CISSP, MCSE, C|EH, CIFI, CGSP
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.owasp.org>http://www.owasp.org
>>>>> --
>>>>> "Si vis pacem, para bellum"
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Lorna Alamri <<lorna.alamri at owasp.org>
>>>>> lorna.alamri at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Brad,
>>>>>> Works for me, does it have the option to be able to select more than
>>>>>> one week? For instance if someone were able to attend all weeks or 3 of the
>>>>>> 5 weeks?
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Lorna
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Brad Causey < <bradcausey at owasp.org>
>>>>>> bradcausey at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Martin,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Once everyone approves the delivery mechanism, we can discuss what
>>>>>>> the questions will be.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Brad Causey
>>>>>>> CISSP, MCSE, C|EH, CIFI, CGSP
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <http://www.owasp.org/>http://www.owasp.org
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> "Si vis pacem, para bellum"
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Martin Knobloch <<martin.knobloch at owasp.org>
>>>>>>> martin.knobloch at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Brad,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Looks like the survey is working fine to me!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> ~Martin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Owasp-summit-2011 mailing list
>>>>>>> <Owasp-summit-2011 at lists.owasp.org>Owasp-summit-2011 at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>>>  <https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-summit-2011>
>>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-summit-2011
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Lorna Alamri
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OWASP Connections
>>>>>> Dir: 651-338-0243
>>>>>> skype: lorna.alamri
>>>>>> <lorna.alamri at owasp.org>lorna.alamri at owasp.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Owasp-summit-2011 mailing list
>>>>>  <Owasp-summit-2011 at lists.owasp.org>Owasp-summit-2011 at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>  <https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-summit-2011>
>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-summit-2011
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-summit-2011 mailing list
>> Owasp-summit-2011 at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-summit-2011
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-summit-2011/attachments/20100924/d2a5b892/attachment.html 


More information about the Owasp-summit-2011 mailing list