[Owasp-leaders] [Owasp-community] Proposed Draft: OWASP Global Industry Advisory Committee
tiffany.long at owasp.org
Fri Jan 26 18:09:21 UTC 2018
Hey all, sorry, I am working on my phone and only the community list was
identified as a recipient. Please ignore the nite that I was adding this
to the other lists, they were there all ready.
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018, 10:07 AM Tiffany Long <tiffany.long at owasp.org> wrote:
> Dear All,
> I am adding the board list and the leaders list to this discussion because
> the community list is well known to be deserted. I feel that Leaders would
> be particularly interested in participating in this discussion. Because
> Bev suggested Tanya reach out to the board I flagged the board list as
> Bev, I know you are the volunteer leader on this project, so maybe you are
> the perfect person to respond. Most of the community did not attend bthe
> board meeting where this was pitched and so it makes sense that there are
> questions. Ithink it would be really helpful to share the information
> widely so that the community knows what exactly we are striving for and
> which aspects of the grant we want to fulfill.
> Would you help us avoid confusion by giving us a couple of pharagraphs on
> the goals of the grant and what, if we should win, OWASP would be doing?
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018, 9:51 AM Bev Corwin <bevcorwin at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Tanya, I suggest that you bring your questions and concerns up at the
>> next board meeting, or at least to the board leadership,etc. I also
>> recommend that you submit your comments and any suggestions for
>> improvements, if there are any, to the shared document. I'm interested in
>> any suggestions that you may have for improvements, or for better solutions
>> to the expressed needs from the community. What are your better solutions?
>> Any to share? I simply responded to the request from the last board meeting
>> with a working draft for review by our community. How exactly did that
>> inspire your outrage? I'm not on the inner circle either, however, I am
>> supportive. It makes good sense that the NYC efforts will benefit the
>> entire OWASP global community, simply based on common sense, IMHO. I also
>> have trust in the current team's efforts, not sure about their particular
>> methods, per se, but I do agree with the previous board's decision and our
>> new ED. No grande theories, just makes good, common sense to me. Thank you.
>> Best wishes, Bev
>> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Tanya Janca <tanya.janca at owasp.org>
>>> Hello Bev,
>>> Would you mind explaining to everyone (so they don’t have to click the
>>> link) what this is and why OWASP is doing this? When I attended the board
>>> meeting this week I was extremely surprised to that OWASP Global was
>>> planning to commit a significant amount of our resources to apply for a
>>> grant that would apply specifically to New York City, rather than all of
>>> our chapters. I have concerns about our foundation spending so much time
>>> and money applying to this when we are a global organization, not a
>>> NYC-specific organization.
>>> If I have concerns, it’s possible that other chapters might also be
>>> concerned when they hear the details. Since you are well informed, would
>>> you mind sharing with the leaders list?
>>> Thank you,
>>> Tanya Janca
>> Owasp-community mailing list
>> Owasp-community at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OWASP-Leaders