[Owasp-leaders] [Owasp-board] FW: MOTION: Bring in Scion Executive Search to Handle ED Search Process

Tanya Janca tanya.janca at owasp.org
Tue Jun 27 13:38:20 UTC 2017


+1

On Jun 27, 2017 9:34 AM, "Larry Conklin" <larry.conklin at owasp.org> wrote:

> Hey guys, this has taken way to long and it's hurting the community and
> Foundation. We need to move on this. Larry Conklin
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Tom Brennan <tomb at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> Leaders, Has anyone seen or heard from
>>
>> Tobias
>> Matt
>> Andrew
>> Martin
>>
>> @Josh staff has a roledex of peoples phone numbers if you want to reach
>> out the old fashion way.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 8:27 AM Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Board,
>>>
>>> This motion was made 11 days ago.  It was seconded by Michael 7 days
>>> ago.  Currently, I am unable to progress with this until a decision is made
>>> and I've been contacted by a number of people who are interested.  We've
>>> also now lost interest from one perspective candidate due to how long this
>>> process has taken.  I need a yes or a no from each of you.
>>>
>>> *MOTION: The Board will allocate up to $45k to hire Scion Executive
>>> Search to conduct the search, evaluation, and hiring process for the new
>>> OWASP Executive Director.*
>>>
>>> Josh - Yes
>>> Michael -
>>> Tobias -
>>> Matt -
>>> Tom - Yes
>>> Andrew -
>>> Martin (Shadow Vote?) -
>>>
>>> ~josh
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Board,
>>>>
>>>> I've had another two inquiries about what is going on with this
>>>> position.  Again, I am unable to make progress here until the Board
>>>> approves the direction.  This cannot wait until the next Board meeting so I
>>>> have requested a vote via email.
>>>>
>>>> *MOTION: The Board will allocate up to $45k to hire Scion Executive
>>>> Search to conduct the search, evaluation, and hiring process for the new
>>>> OWASP Executive Director.*
>>>>
>>>> Josh - Yes
>>>> Michael -
>>>> Tobias -
>>>> Matt -
>>>> Tom - Yes
>>>> Andrew -
>>>> Martin (Shadow Vote?) -
>>>>
>>>> ~josh
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Tom Pappas <tpappas at virtualmgmt.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Good morning everyone,  I am forwarding Ann’s response to Josh’s
>>>>> questions below regarding the Virtual proposal.  Take care
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As clarification of the Virtual ED recruitment proposal, as per the
>>>>> below statement on the proposal, we will do an active search and not just
>>>>> review submitted resumes:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> “outreach to passive candidates, US & global”
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The first section of the following statement from Josh is accurate,
>>>>> SCION  can leverage an existing global network of candidates that we don’t
>>>>> have, that is where we would partner with our global recruitment group.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> leveraging an existing global network of highly qualified candidates.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> However, Miriam would be actively seeking candidates on OWASP’s behalf.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thomas S. Pappas, MSA |   Senior Vice President of Finance &
>>>>> Administration | Virtual, Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>> D: +1-781-876-8914 <(781)%20876-8914>
>>>>>
>>>>> F:  +1-781-623-8460 <(781)%20623-8460>
>>>>>
>>>>> *tpappas at virtualmgmt.com <tpappas at virtualmgmt.com>*
>>>>>
>>>>> 401 Edgewater Place, Suite 600, Wakefield, MA 01880
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [image: cid:image001.png at 01CE7100.10DF2040]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* owasp-board-bounces+tpappas=virtualmgmt.com at lists.owasp.org
>>>>> [mailto:owasp-board-bounces+tpappas=virtualmgmt.com at lists.owasp.org] *On
>>>>> Behalf Of *Josh Sokol
>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, June 23, 2017 12:38 PM
>>>>> *To:* OWASP Board List (owasp-board at lists.owasp.org) <
>>>>> owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Owasp-board] FW: MOTION: Bring in Scion Executive
>>>>> Search to Handle ED Search Process
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Board,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure if you've had a chance to review the proposal from
>>>>> Virtual yet, but it is fundamentally different than the Scion proposal in
>>>>> several ways.  Virtual's proposal is for posting to the job board, tracking
>>>>> of applicants, review and communication with candidates, scheduling of
>>>>> interviews and taking notes/scoring, and preparing the offer.  Scion's
>>>>> package is all-inclusive and they are leveraging an existing global network
>>>>> of highly qualified candidates.  They are a recruiter actively seeking out
>>>>> candidates on our behalf versus Virtual's proposal to post a job and
>>>>> waiting for qualified candidates to come to us.  In order to add the
>>>>> recruitment function, it would add approximately $29k-34k, in addition to
>>>>> the $6k for the initial services, not to mention that it would be
>>>>> effectively starting the search again.  Another major difference is that
>>>>> Virtual is not offering any placement guarantee.  Even at a 30% commission
>>>>> (I'm estimating at $40k), Scion would still offer us a 6 months placement
>>>>> guarantee.  I have no skin in the game with either of these companies, but
>>>>> my gut says that if OWASP truly wants a global search for the best ED
>>>>> available, then Scion is the way to go.  If we are simply looking for
>>>>> someone to manage the process for us, then Virtual would be the better
>>>>> option.  My gut is to go with Scion.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have made a formal motion.  Michael seconded it on June 20th and I
>>>>> haven't seen any discussion from the other Board members.  This process is
>>>>> stalled and we have candidates waiting on a decision from the Board.
>>>>> Please vote.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh - Yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael -
>>>>>
>>>>> Tobias -
>>>>>
>>>>> Matt -
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom -
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew -
>>>>>
>>>>> Martin (Shadow Vote?) -
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Andrew van der Stock <
>>>>> vanderaj at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Tom, much appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Tom Pappas <tpappas at virtualmgmt.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello everyone, Please find the attached proposal from the Virtual HR
>>>>> team, with regard to the ED search, for your review,  as was requested.  I
>>>>> am sending this along as our VP of HR Ann Geary does not have access to the
>>>>> Board list for OWASP.  If you have any questions please do not hesitate to
>>>>> let us know.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Take care and thank you for allowing us to present this proposal to
>>>>> assist OWASP in its ED search as we have in past searches.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thomas S. Pappas, MSA |   Senior Vice President of Finance &
>>>>> Administration | Virtual, Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>> D: +1-781-876-8914 <(781)%20876-8914>
>>>>>
>>>>> F:  +1-781-623-8460 <(781)%20623-8460>
>>>>>
>>>>> *tpappas at virtualmgmt.com <tpappas at virtualmgmt.com>*
>>>>>
>>>>> 401 Edgewater Place, Suite 600, Wakefield, MA 01880
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [image: cid:image001.png at 01CE7100.10DF2040]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Ann Geary
>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 21, 2017 1:36 PM
>>>>> *To:* Tom Pappas <tpappas at virtualmgmt.com>; Josh Sokol <
>>>>> josh.sokol at owasp.org>; Kate Hartmann <kate.hartmann at owasp.org>
>>>>> *Cc:* OWASP Board List <owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>; Miriam Macedo <
>>>>> mmacedo at virtualmgmt.com>
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [Owasp-board] MOTION: Bring in Scion Executive Search
>>>>> to Handle ED Search Process
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Attached is a draft of the OWASP recruitment proposal.  I’ve copied
>>>>> Miriam Macedo, Virtual’s HR Recruitment Manager who has conducted numerous
>>>>> global searches, including ED recruitment efforts. Miriam would do a great
>>>>> job, but we want to be realistic and acknowledge that if there is a need
>>>>> for a full blown global search, we would partner with a group we have
>>>>> utilized for more “niche” searches. Our contact  has more expertise and
>>>>> connections in the global arena. Our  proposal is as follows:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    - Attached standard search fee is in the range of $6,000
>>>>>    - If no viable candidate is identified in an agreed upon
>>>>>    timeframe, we would partner with our global search firm contact in the UK
>>>>>     with whom we’ve negotiated a 15-25%  fee of base salary & negotiated
>>>>>    bonus.  would add approx. $29,000 - $34,000, dependent on salary
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We do not mark up their fee structure:
>>>>>
>>>>> *Fee Structure; Based upon 1st years agreed salary, plus any
>>>>> agreed/built in bonuses.*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Remuneration (usd$)               % of Remuneration Paid*
>>>>>
>>>>> *0          - 100,000                     25%*
>>>>>
>>>>> *100,001 – 125,000                   20% *
>>>>>
>>>>> *125,001 -  150,000                      18% (subject to min fee
>>>>> $25,000)*
>>>>>
>>>>> *150,001 +                                    15% (subject to min fee
>>>>> $27,500)*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *4.         REFUND GUARANTEES*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *4.1       In order to qualify for the following guarantees, the
>>>>> Client must pay the Company’s fee within 15 days of the date of invoice and
>>>>> must notify the Company in writing of the termination of the Engagement
>>>>> within 7 days of its termination. *
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *4.2       Where the Candidate leaves during the first 8 weeks of the
>>>>> Engagement, a pro-rated refund of the introduction fee shall be paid to the
>>>>> Client in accordance with the scale set out below, subject to the
>>>>> conditions in clause 4. *
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Week in which the Candidate leaves   % of the introduction fee
>>>>> refunded*
>>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>> 1                                                                90%*
>>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>> 2                                                                80%*
>>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>> 3                                                                70%       *
>>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>> 4                                                                60%*
>>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>> 5                                                                50%*
>>>>>
>>>>> *6*
>>>>> *40%*
>>>>>
>>>>> *7*
>>>>> *30%*
>>>>>
>>>>> *8*
>>>>> *20%*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *There will be no refund where the Candidate leaves during or after
>>>>> the 8th week of the Engagement. *
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *4.3       If, after an offer of Engagement has been made to the
>>>>> Candidate, the Client decides for any reason to withdraw it, the Client
>>>>> shall be liable to pay the Company. *
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *10% of the Remuneration where the annual Remuneration.*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> With our competitive fee, Virtual does not offer any placement
>>>>> guarantee; our fee is based on work produced, and not a % of candidate
>>>>> salary.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A few points of note:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    - If the finalist is not in the US, and you want to add him/her to
>>>>>    payroll, we may need to negotiate a contract for services with our global
>>>>>    HR partner; we can’t provide fees until we confirm the location
>>>>>    - If the finalist is in the US, an OWASP staff member needs to
>>>>>    manage the onboarding with Insperity
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions regarding the proposal.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ann
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ann O’Connor Geary |   Vice President, Human Resources | Virtual, Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>> D: +1.781.876.6273 <(781)%20876-6273>  |  M: +1.781.606.1350
>>>>> <(781)%20606-1350>
>>>>>
>>>>> *ageary at virtualmgmt.com <ageary at virtualmgmt.com>*
>>>>> blog.virtualmgmt.com
>>>>>
>>>>> 401 Edgewater Place, Suite 600, Wakefield, MA 01880
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [image: cid:image001.png at 01CF1218.1E0F0690]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Tom Pappas
>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 20, 2017 4:58 PM
>>>>> *To:* Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org>; Kate Hartmann <
>>>>> kate.hartmann at owasp.org>
>>>>> *Cc:* OWASP Board List <owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>; Ann Geary <
>>>>> ageary at virtualmgmt.com>
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [Owasp-board] MOTION: Bring in Scion Executive Search
>>>>> to Handle ED Search Process
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello Josh,  I have just received the Virtual HR search proposal and
>>>>> will be reviewing so it can be sent to you all tomorrow. Wanted to keep
>>>>> everyone updated.  Take care
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thomas S. Pappas, MSA |   Senior Vice President of Finance &
>>>>> Administration | Virtual, Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>> D: +1-781-876-8914 <(781)%20876-8914>
>>>>>
>>>>> F:  +1-781-623-8460 <(781)%20623-8460>
>>>>>
>>>>> *tpappas at virtualmgmt.com <tpappas at virtualmgmt.com>*
>>>>>
>>>>> 401 Edgewater Place, Suite 600, Wakefield, MA 01880
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [image: cid:image001.png at 01CE7100.10DF2040]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Josh Sokol [mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org <josh.sokol at owasp.org>]
>>>>>
>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 20, 2017 4:23 PM
>>>>> *To:* Kate Hartmann <kate.hartmann at owasp.org>
>>>>> *Cc:* Tom Pappas <tpappas at virtualmgmt.com>; OWASP Board List <
>>>>> owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Owasp-board] MOTION: Bring in Scion Executive Search
>>>>> to Handle ED Search Process
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> OWASP Board Members,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am receiving emails from interested parties, but am unsure as to how
>>>>> you want to move the ball forward.  Without a second on my motion, I'm
>>>>> afraid that our direction is simply to "do it ourselves" again, which none
>>>>> of us have the time for and we had a very narrow reach last time.  I'm
>>>>> trying to drive this forward, but I cannot do so without your participation
>>>>> in the process.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ~josh
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, do any of those specialize in search for non-profits?  Can you
>>>>> please inquire with those what the fees would be for a retained search?
>>>>> That would at least give us a baseline to tell if Scion's fees are
>>>>> reasonable.  Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ~josh
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Kate Hartmann <
>>>>> kate.hartmann at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not familiar with executive search firms, however, a google search
>>>>> for "international executive search firms" provide this link with the top 10
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.topexecutivesearchfirms.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Overview
>>>>>
>>>>> *Top Executive Search Firms* exists as a resource to employers
>>>>> seeking to understand the complexities of the executive search/recruiting
>>>>> industry. Our research offers prospective employers an unbiased look at the
>>>>> top executive search firms by offering resources, opinions, and rankings as
>>>>> a guide to helping you choose the best firm to meet your executive search
>>>>> needs. This list will be updated each year based upon an algorithmic
>>>>> approach with includes public voting. We do not accept payment from
>>>>> executive search firms for inclusion on this list. We do accept advertising
>>>>> from industry partners, vendors, suppliers, and employers.
>>>>> Qualifications
>>>>>
>>>>> In order to qualify for the Top 20 Executive Search Firms list,
>>>>> organizations must be retained search firms, have multiple practice areas,
>>>>> have displayed recognized thought leadership, and must have completed
>>>>> signature searches for global brands in multiple geographies.
>>>>> Ranking Methodology
>>>>>
>>>>> The ranking order for the Top 20 Executive Search Firms list is
>>>>> derived algorithmically based upon a proprietary weighting of the following
>>>>> criteria: annual revenue, number of placements, number of ancillary
>>>>> services or practice areas, level of searches handled by average salary,
>>>>> completion ratio, average time to complete, stick rate, client satisfaction
>>>>> (testimonials/votes), social media presence, and executive thought
>>>>> leadership. Our algorithm also negatively weights adverse circumstances
>>>>> (e.g. candidate exited based upon discovery which the search firm should
>>>>> have filtered, client litigation, poaching, etc.).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [image: Image removed by sender.]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Virtual has not presented us with any similar proposals for searching
>>>>> for and hiring an ED.  The service we used them for was a Virtual ED
>>>>> server, and eventually we hired Paul from them.  If they have a global
>>>>> search service, then that option has not been presented to us yet.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think anyone on the Board is familiar with this company.  I
>>>>> was the only Board member who attended the initial meeting with them, but
>>>>> Claudia and Dawn attended as well.  The entire meeting was recorded and
>>>>> posted earlier, but I don't think anyone else has listened to it, or even
>>>>> read through their proposal.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a global search.  I haven't seen any other companies brought
>>>>> to us.  Did you have a recommendation for someone else to look into?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ~josh
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Owasp <kate.hartmann at owasp.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Using a third party is a good idea, but I'd strongly recommend
>>>>> interviewing at least one other firm. This is a large spend and a decision
>>>>> that impacts the future direction of OWASP!  Why is there no consideration
>>>>> to use the firm that presented Paul?  Is everyone on the board familiar
>>>>> with this company?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Impact aside, would the board be OK with operations committing to a
>>>>> $45k spend without at least two additional options?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I might have missed it, but I didn't see anything in scion's Q&A about
>>>>> searching internationally for candidates. Will they search globally, or is
>>>>> it just a US search?
>>>>>
>>>>> Kate Hartmann
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 16, 2017, at 4:51 PM, Tom Pappas <tpappas at virtualmgmt.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Josh thank you for the clarification.  Take care
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thomas S. Pappas, MSA |   Senior Vice President of Finance &
>>>>> Administration | Virtual, Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>> D: +1-781-876-8914 <(781)%20876-8914>
>>>>>
>>>>> F:  +1-781-623-8460 <(781)%20623-8460>
>>>>>
>>>>> *tpappas at virtualmgmt.com <tpappas at virtualmgmt.com>*
>>>>>
>>>>> 401 Edgewater Place, Suite 600, Wakefield, MA 01880
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <image001.png>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Josh Sokol [mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org <josh.sokol at owasp.org>]
>>>>>
>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, June 16, 2017 4:48 PM
>>>>> *To:* Tom Pappas <tpappas at virtualmgmt.com>
>>>>> *Cc:* OWASP Board List <owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Owasp-board] MOTION: Bring in Scion Executive Search
>>>>> to Handle ED Search Process
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That is correct.  We would be paying them to effectively run the
>>>>> search and hire process for us.  I would encourage all candidates to go
>>>>> through that process.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ~josh
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Tom Pappas <tpappas at virtualmgmt.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello Josh, so I have a couple of questions with regard to the note
>>>>> below.  Based on the billing it seems that Scion is handling the entire
>>>>> process and that any and all candidates should go through them, as I have
>>>>> just received the resume from the individual that we had identified and
>>>>> does this mean that Matt T either has to interview with Scion or is out of
>>>>> the running.  Just want to get a bit of clarity as to what the process is
>>>>> for candidates that Scion does not identify in their search.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Take care
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thomas S. Pappas, MSA |   Senior Vice President of Finance &
>>>>> Administration | Virtual, Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>> D: +1-781-876-8914 <(781)%20876-8914>
>>>>>
>>>>> F:  +1-781-623-8460 <(781)%20623-8460>
>>>>>
>>>>> *tpappas at virtualmgmt.com <tpappas at virtualmgmt.com>*
>>>>>
>>>>> 401 Edgewater Place, Suite 600, Wakefield, MA 01880
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <image001.png>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* owasp-board-bounces+tpappas=virtualmgmt.com at lists.owasp.org
>>>>> [mailto:owasp-board-bounces+tpappas=virtualmgmt.com at lists.owasp.org] *On
>>>>> Behalf Of *Josh Sokol
>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, June 16, 2017 4:08 PM
>>>>> *To:* OWASP Board List <owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>>>> *Subject:* [Owasp-board] MOTION: Bring in Scion Executive Search to
>>>>> Handle ED Search Process
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> OWASP Board,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There's been some discussion in the other thread regarding the
>>>>> proposal from Scion.  I am including the proposal as it contains answers to
>>>>> many of the questions that have been asked.  The only argument that I've
>>>>> really heard against this is monetary and I truly feel like we shouldn't
>>>>> let that stand in the way of hiring the best ED for the Foundation.  Given
>>>>> no internal expertise in these matters, it is my recommendation that the
>>>>> Board move forward with the proposal from Scion.  To that end, I have a
>>>>> question and a formal motion.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Question: Would we like a six-month or twelve-month placement
>>>>> guarantee on the hire?  The difference is an additional 3% of the annual
>>>>> salary.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *MOTION: The Board will allocate up to $45k to hire Scion Executive
>>>>> Search to conduct the search, evaluation, and hiring process for the new
>>>>> OWASP Executive Director.*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is based on the high-range salary estimate of $135k and 33%
>>>>> number for the 12-month placement.  This would be billed 1/3rd upon the
>>>>> signing of the contract, 1/3rd 60 days later, and 1/3rd on the new ED's
>>>>> start date.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For the record, our ED recruitment process is stalled until we either
>>>>> approve or reject this motion.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ~josh
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> *<image002.jpg> Scion Executive Search Proposal - Open Web Appl...
>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/a/owasp.org/file/d/0Bw1W2qFZ-xDGeWl6WUNIdlk3b3hSM0lvUmxKZjlBREFTZnlV/view?usp=drive_web>*
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Kate Hartmann
>>>>>
>>>>> kate.hartmann at owasp.org
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 301-275-9403 <(301)%20275-9403>
>>>>>
>>>>> [image: Image removed by sender.]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20170627/47171025/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6204 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20170627/47171025/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 15940 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20170627/47171025/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 332 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20170627/47171025/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 395 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20170627/47171025/attachment-0003.jpg>


More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list