[Owasp-leaders] [Owasp-board] Regarding Budget 2017- Allow OWASP members to participate
johanna curiel curiel
johanna.curiel at owasp.org
Fri Sep 9 00:31:25 UTC 2016
*Curious to know what you suggest. *
*Currently we have the following:*
- *Open board mailing list*
- *Open board meetings with published agenda and minutes*
- *Recorded board meetings available for review*
*Are there other approaches that you think would help?*
Just a s Michael mentioned, there are enough channels to kind of 'monitor'
what the board does.
Just make sure you are subscribed to the board list and you will see all
the exchange emails on Board issues that are openly discussed.
Lets remember our core values:
We indeed have all the tools to 'listen' what is going on but communication
should work both sides.
Right now my concern is that we don't have the right tools to actually
submit our issues to the Board and that these are properly follow up.
I find myself harassing board members for answers sometimes, like, when
will the Financial reports of 2015 be ready, or why Iranian leaders cannot
be accepted as Owasp members.
Can we use the contact form for this? Does the board have access to
Salesforce in order to follow up the issues or questions raised by the
Can we actually set a proper process so the community concerns don't get
lost or forgotten?
This is of course, if we consider these values still valid.
*OPEN Everything at OWASP is radically transparent from our finances to our
*INNOVATION* OWASP encourages and supports innovation and experiments for
solutions to software security challenges.
*GLOBAL Anyone around the world is encouraged to participate in the OWASP
*INTEGRITY* OWASP is an honest and truthful, vendor neutral, global
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Michael Coates <michael.coates at owasp.org>
> Curious to know what you suggest.
> Currently we have the following
> Open board mailing list
> Open board meetings with published agenda and minutes
> Recorded board meetings available for review
> Are there other approaches that you think would help?
> On Thursday, September 8, 2016, Larry Conklin <larry.conklin at owasp.org>
>> Hi all,
>> Johanna, Thank you for making this aware to me. Board, there really needs
>> to be an improved way you communicate to the community. Not sure what it
>> is. One thing is maybe more info on board directions, discussions, etc in
>> the OWASP connector.
>> Budget feedback,
>> I agree with Josh about not shafting Chapters. Lets not do that.
>> *$610k each for education, outreach, conferences, projects. I would like
>> to see a better break out on each item. Especially projects since we have
>> seen much heartache about projects not getting their share of love.*
>> *Last I would like to see an agile approach on then **$270k for the
>> website so we don't get to the end of the budget and then decide its wasn't
>> what we needed or wanted. Can we do the website in a step approach so we
>> can begin using part of the new web site along with the old web site. I
>> never see the big bang approach working out for the best.*
>> *Larry Conklin, CISSP, Co-leader of Code Review Project.*
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:57 AM, johanna curiel curiel <
>> johanna.curiel at owasp.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Board
>>> On another email, Andrew has proposed some ideas on how the Budget for
>>> 2017 should be administered:
>>> I think you should consider creating a survey where you allow OWASP
>>> members to vote on such important matters.Especially, when it seems there
>>> are conflicting opinions already between board members.
>>> These kind of decisions have a huge impact on the entire community
>>> across OWASP, and it should be consider at least, to allow members to vote
>>> regarding this before any final decisions are taken by the board.
>>> Johanna Curiel
>>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
> Michael Coates | @_mwc <https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=_mwc>
> OWASP Global Board
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OWASP-Leaders