[Owasp-leaders] [Owasp-board] Regarding Budget 2017- Allow OWASP members to participate
bev.corwin at owasp.org
Thu Sep 8 15:47:05 UTC 2016
+1 Johanna and Josh
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:44 AM, johanna curiel curiel <
johanna.curiel at owasp.org> wrote:
> >>If members want to highlight concerns with a given itemization or area,
> I would fully welcome seeing that feedback discussed.
> Agree with this too. My concern right now is that the proposal discussed
> will allocate 0 dollars to chapters.
> Another of my concern is how much money the board is proposing to spend on
> the website
> *o how big is this pie? We need to make a budget that stretches us to make
> *>* $3m in FY17, which means we need to look at all sources of income, and what
> *>* we need to do to make that a reality. Our revenue in 2015 was $2,478,184.
> *>* If we say we can do $2.7m this year (possible, depends on AppSec USA
> *>* profitability), $3m is within our grasp. So 10% is $300,000 administrative
> *>* costs, and then $610k each for education, outreach, conferences, projects,
> *>* and up to $270k for the website. That is with no contingency, and assumes
> *>* AppSec USA is at least 10% more profitable than last year's.
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Greg Anderson <greg.anderson at owasp.org>
>> +1 on Josh's input.
>> I think the Board is best equipped to act on behalf of the community's
>> best interests. The Board possesses the most wholistic view of our
>> operations while I feel most leaders / members only have a limited
>> perspective. As Josh already pointed out, I don't believe a vote would
>> equate to a good consensus in this case. If members want to highlight
>> concerns with a given itemization or area, I would fully welcome seeing
>> that feedback discussed.
>> OWASP DefectDojo Project Leader
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>> I'm curious if there are others who feel like a community vote should
>>> happen for the OWASP Foundation annual budget? I agree with Johanna that
>>> this is a decision that has a huge impact on the OWASP community, but the
>>> OWASP Foundation Bylaws do not specify any process around membership voting
>>> for anything other than the Board of Directors for the Foundation. Not
>>> only would a vote on the budget be a first for the Foundation, with no
>>> proper guidelines around it, but I have some concerns about a vote not
>>> really equating to a consensus, based on past turnouts. And then there's
>>> the issue of timeline...
>>> So far, I haven't really heard any feedback on Andrew's budgeting
>>> proposal, other than Tom and I, and I would really like to know if there
>>> are others who feel strongly about this topic before we consider the
>>> logistics involved with a community-wide vote on a topic that has
>>> historically been handled by the OWASP Foundation Board and staff.
>>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 6:57 AM, johanna curiel curiel <
>>> johanna.curiel at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi Board
>>>> On another email, Andrew has proposed some ideas on how the Budget for
>>>> 2017 should be administered:
>>>> I think you should consider creating a survey where you allow OWASP
>>>> members to vote on such important matters.Especially, when it seems there
>>>> are conflicting opinions already between board members.
>>>> These kind of decisions have a huge impact on the entire community
>>>> across OWASP, and it should be consider at least, to allow members to vote
>>>> regarding this before any final decisions are taken by the board.
>>>> Johanna Curiel
>>>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>>>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
>>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
> Johanna Curiel
> OWASP Volunteer
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OWASP-Leaders