[Owasp-leaders] Regarding Budget 2017- Allow OWASP members to participate
johanna curiel curiel
johanna.curiel at owasp.org
Thu Sep 8 15:44:12 UTC 2016
>>If members want to highlight concerns with a given itemization or area, I
would fully welcome seeing that feedback discussed.
Agree with this too. My concern right now is that the proposal discussed
will allocate 0 dollars to chapters.
Another of my concern is how much money the board is proposing to spend on
*o how big is this pie? We need to make a budget that stretches us to make
*>* $3m in FY17, which means we need to look at all sources of income, and what
*>* we need to do to make that a reality. Our revenue in 2015 was $2,478,184.
*>* If we say we can do $2.7m this year (possible, depends on AppSec USA
*>* profitability), $3m is within our grasp. So 10% is $300,000 administrative
*>* costs, and then $610k each for education, outreach, conferences, projects,
*>* and up to $270k for the website. That is with no contingency, and assumes
*>* AppSec USA is at least 10% more profitable than last year's.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Greg Anderson <greg.anderson at owasp.org>
> +1 on Josh's input.
> I think the Board is best equipped to act on behalf of the community's
> best interests. The Board possesses the most wholistic view of our
> operations while I feel most leaders / members only have a limited
> perspective. As Josh already pointed out, I don't believe a vote would
> equate to a good consensus in this case. If members want to highlight
> concerns with a given itemization or area, I would fully welcome seeing
> that feedback discussed.
> OWASP DefectDojo Project Leader
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>> I'm curious if there are others who feel like a community vote should
>> happen for the OWASP Foundation annual budget? I agree with Johanna that
>> this is a decision that has a huge impact on the OWASP community, but the
>> OWASP Foundation Bylaws do not specify any process around membership voting
>> for anything other than the Board of Directors for the Foundation. Not
>> only would a vote on the budget be a first for the Foundation, with no
>> proper guidelines around it, but I have some concerns about a vote not
>> really equating to a consensus, based on past turnouts. And then there's
>> the issue of timeline...
>> So far, I haven't really heard any feedback on Andrew's budgeting
>> proposal, other than Tom and I, and I would really like to know if there
>> are others who feel strongly about this topic before we consider the
>> logistics involved with a community-wide vote on a topic that has
>> historically been handled by the OWASP Foundation Board and staff.
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 6:57 AM, johanna curiel curiel <
>> johanna.curiel at owasp.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Board
>>> On another email, Andrew has proposed some ideas on how the Budget for
>>> 2017 should be administered:
>>> I think you should consider creating a survey where you allow OWASP
>>> members to vote on such important matters.Especially, when it seems there
>>> are conflicting opinions already between board members.
>>> These kind of decisions have a huge impact on the entire community
>>> across OWASP, and it should be consider at least, to allow members to vote
>>> regarding this before any final decisions are taken by the board.
>>> Johanna Curiel
>>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OWASP-Leaders