[Owasp-leaders] [Owasp-board] Meetups
psiinon at gmail.com
Tue Mar 10 09:47:19 UTC 2015
In 2010 we held a Leeds (UK) chapter meeting in Manchester (they're close
in US terms, but not that close in UK terms;).
That was a deliberate test to see if there was an appetite for security
events in Manchester, and as a result of the successful event we started
the Manchester chapter.
So I think it can be a very good idea to have chapter meetings in new
areas, although I would obviously be very wary of one chapter 'encroaching'
on another's area ;)
I'm also in favour of combined events - we've talked about doing that in
the north of England (but not done so yet) and I'm sure this will have been
done in other areas.
I'd say go for it - see how many people turn up. If you expand OWASP's
'reach' then its good. If you dont get as many people as you hoped then
maybe it wasnt such a good idea.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Bev Corwin <bev.corwin at owasp.org> wrote:
> Hi Noreen,
> If there is policy, please share it. I wasn't able to find one. Thank you
> and best wishes.
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Noreen Whysel <noreen.whysel at owasp.org>
>> Hi Bev,
>> I am not aware of that specific restriction, although I would assume that
>> members of a chapter would expect meetings to be held within their local
>> areas most of the time. If a meeting were held outside the chapter area,
>> and especially if there is already another chapter in the proposed meeting
>> location, we would expect the courtesy of inviting the other group to
>> participate, or at least informing them of the meeting in case there is a
>> potential conflict or competing event.
>> I am aware that the Brooklyn chapter has tentatively planned a May
>> meeting in Midtown Manhattan. Brooklyn is located in very close quarters
>> with NYC, LI and NJ and these chapters share some of its leadership, so I
>> am assuming that there has been discussion among the chapters involved.
>> Given this point I wonder if it is less about territory and more about
>> developing the Brooklyn chapter within its own community. Has there been
>> difficulty finding meeting space? Are there organizations and institutions
>> in Brooklyn that we should be trying to connect with?
>> There are other chapters with similar satellite type relationships, which
>> you may want to look to for guidance, although my impression is that the
>> NYC relationship is strong. Chapters may in fact choose to connect with or
>> provide support to other chapters that are not nearby. We hope that in
>> the long run these relationships serve to strengthen the OWASP community
>> at large.
>> Noreen Whysel
>> Community Manager
>> OWASP Foundation
>> On Mar 9, 2015, at 11:00 PM, Bev Corwin <bev.corwin at owasp.org> wrote:
>> Dear OWASP Board and Leaders,
>> Are OWASP Chapters geographically limited by their local areas as in
>> 'territories" for where they decide to hold meetups? For example, if the
>> OWASP Brooklyn Chapter decided to hold a meetup in say, Anchorage, for
>> example, would that be a problem? Or, perhaps OWASP Brooklyn meetups wanted
>> to share a meetup with some other group in say, for example, Boston? Is
>> there some kind of organization "territorial" limitation to locations based
>> on the group's locations? If this is a policy, please kindly point me to
>> the link. I have not been able to find it. Thank you and best wishes.
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
OWASP ZAP <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/ZAP> Project leader
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OWASP-Leaders