[Owasp-leaders] Profiling as software Open Source organization

psiinon psiinon at gmail.com
Wed Mar 4 15:21:33 UTC 2015


Ah, I knew something like this had already been mentioned on the leaders
list:
http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/2015-February/013784.html

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:14 PM, psiinon <psiinon at gmail.com> wrote:

> Only that I've been told that some existing OWASP supporters are unhappy
> with the impact that they think ZAP is having on their business.
> No ones complained directly to me, and I dont want to point fingers
> without some concrete evidence.
> I think it would be much better if any companies with issues about any
> OWASP project could be more open about it - this could be a good
> opportunity for them to step forwards? :)
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Bev Corwin <bev.corwin at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> Could you explain more about this problem?
>>
>> Bev
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:18 AM, psiinon <psiinon at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I've heard through the grapevine that some existing sponsors are really
>>> unhappy with ZAP as they think it is potentially impacting their business.
>>> I suspect they would be _very_ unhappy if OWASP started to pay for extra
>>> people to work on ZAP ;)
>>> If we start investing more in projects like ZAP then these sort of
>>> concerns are going to increasingly occur.
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> OWASP ZAP <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/ZAP> Project leader
>



-- 
OWASP ZAP <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/ZAP> Project leader
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20150304/c6f24f46/attachment.html>


More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list