[Owasp-leaders] Owasp_nni_initiative post from eoin.keary at owasp.org requires approval

Eoin Keary eoin.keary at owasp.org
Thu Sep 11 20:57:40 UTC 2014


If you want to talk at some point next week that would be fine by me. I'm 100% owasp next week!

Eoin Keary
Owasp Global Board
+353 87 977 2988


On 11 Sep 2014, at 20:13, Bev Corwin <bev.corwin at owasp.org> wrote:

> PS: I was going to try to get to out Denver / Boulder but have a plenary to attend in Tampa. Alas! But I will be happy to set up a GoToMeeting session to discuss with anyone interested, or from the AppSecUSA Denver event.
> 
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Bev Corwin <bev.corwin at owasp.org> wrote:
>> Good points and I understand the issues, a few thoughts:
>> 
>> Regarding the open and NDA dynamic tensions; Could we have open meetings, and work with them only within the "open" space? We could also discuss and determine how GIC's programs and initiatives could participate and respect both by creating some kind of common guidelines / shared space especially for this kind of activity. For example, if we were to create a separate OWASP Industry Consortium, a 501(c)6 partner organization for this type of activity. I'd be happy to help with incorporation an OWASP Industry Consortium, 501(c)6 if possible? Thoughts?
>> 
>> Bev
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Eoin Keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
>>> We tried invite based meeting with industry representatives like a "lunch and learn" but for reps to talk freely NDA's would be required which is deemed against our radical openness.
>>> 
>>> This CISO project is good (engagement) and the  survey was developed by myself and others to assist with industry engagement. I'm unsure what the "next step" is after that....this survey was to help guide owasp interns of industry relevance but I'm unsure if that is still the aim, best ask Tobias/Marco.
>>> 
>>> Production quality projects certainly shall help with industry engagement but unsure if we will ever be industry quality and the last 20% of production quality stuff is always very difficult to achieve and maintain.
>>> 
>>> If you are in Denver next week id love to have a beer with people involved to talk this through :)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Eoin Keary
>>> Owasp Global Board
>>> +353 87 977 2988
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 11 Sep 2014, at 18:41, Bev Corwin <bev.corwin at owasp.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Dear Eoin,
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you!
>>>> 
>>>> All is open for discussion at this stage. I'm just trying to reboot efforts as requested and happy to work together to help define scope and focus. Thanks for your enthusiasm! What do you think that our "Go to Market Plan" should look like? Best wishes.
>>>> 
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> Bev
>>>>  
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: Eoin Keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Owasp-leaders] OWASP Global Industry Committee
>>>>  
>>>>> Hi Bev,
>>>>> Is the goal to engage with industry or standards groups or ?
>>>>> Engagement with industry ties tightly to our projects and edu material IMHO.
>>>>> What's the "go to market plan" If i may ask? Very keen for the committee to work!!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Eoin Keary
>>>>> Owasp Global Board
>>>>> +353 87 977 2988
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>>>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20140911/c2e2bd68/attachment.html>


More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list