[Owasp-leaders] Owasp_nni_initiative post from eoin.keary at owasp.org requires approval

Bev Corwin bev.corwin at owasp.org
Thu Sep 11 19:26:45 UTC 2014


Thanks Tobias! Will do!

Bev

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Tobias <tobias.gondrom at owasp.org> wrote:

>  Count me in.
> Tobias
>
>
>
> On 11/09/14 20:13, Bev Corwin wrote:
>
> PS: I was going to try to get to out Denver / Boulder but have a plenary
> to attend in Tampa. Alas! But I will be happy to set up a GoToMeeting
> session to discuss with anyone interested, or from the AppSecUSA Denver
> event.
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Bev Corwin <bev.corwin at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>>  Good points and I understand the issues, a few thoughts:
>>
>>  Regarding the open and NDA dynamic tensions; Could we have open
>> meetings, and work with them only within the "open" space? We could also
>> discuss and determine how GIC's programs and initiatives could participate
>> and respect both by creating some kind of common guidelines / shared space
>> especially for this kind of activity. For example, if we were to create a
>> separate OWASP Industry Consortium, a 501(c)6 partner organization for this
>> type of activity. I'd be happy to help with incorporation an OWASP Industry
>> Consortium, 501(c)6 if possible? Thoughts?
>>
>>  Bev
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Eoin Keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>>  We tried invite based meeting with industry representatives like a
>>> "lunch and learn" but for reps to talk freely NDA's would be required which
>>> is deemed against our radical openness.
>>>
>>>  This CISO project is good (engagement) and the  survey was developed
>>> by myself and others to assist with industry engagement. I'm unsure what
>>> the "next step" is after that....this survey was to help guide owasp
>>> interns of industry relevance but I'm unsure if that is still the aim, best
>>> ask Tobias/Marco.
>>>
>>>  Production quality projects certainly shall help with industry
>>> engagement but unsure if we will ever be industry quality and the last 20%
>>> of production quality stuff is always very difficult to achieve and
>>> maintain.
>>>
>>>  If you are in Denver next week id love to have a beer with people
>>> involved to talk this through :)
>>>
>>>
>>> Eoin Keary
>>> Owasp Global Board
>>> +353 87 977 2988 <%2B353%2087%20977%202988>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11 Sep 2014, at 18:41, Bev Corwin <bev.corwin at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>  Dear Eoin,
>>>
>>>  Thank you!
>>>
>>>  All is open for discussion at this stage. I'm just trying to reboot
>>> efforts as requested and happy to work together to help define scope and
>>> focus. Thanks for your enthusiasm! What do you think that our "Go to Market
>>> Plan" should look like? Best wishes.
>>>
>>>  Sincerely,
>>> Bev
>>>
>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Eoin Keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Owasp-leaders] OWASP Global Industry Committee
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>  Hi Bev,
>>>> Is the goal to engage with industry or standards groups or ?
>>>> Engagement with industry ties tightly to our projects and edu material
>>>> IMHO.
>>>> What's the "go to market plan" If i may ask? Very keen for the
>>>> committee to work!!
>>>>
>>>> Eoin Keary
>>>> Owasp Global Board
>>>> +353 87 977 2988 <%2B353%2087%20977%202988>
>>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OWASP-Leaders mailing listOWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.orghttps://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20140911/ad08be43/attachment.html>


More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list