[Owasp-leaders] Owasp_nni_initiative post from eoin.keary at owasp.org requires approval

Bev Corwin bev.corwin at owasp.org
Thu Sep 11 19:13:48 UTC 2014


PS: I was going to try to get to out Denver / Boulder but have a plenary to
attend in Tampa. Alas! But I will be happy to set up a GoToMeeting session
to discuss with anyone interested, or from the AppSecUSA Denver event.

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Bev Corwin <bev.corwin at owasp.org> wrote:

> Good points and I understand the issues, a few thoughts:
>
> Regarding the open and NDA dynamic tensions; Could we have open meetings,
> and work with them only within the "open" space? We could also discuss and
> determine how GIC's programs and initiatives could participate and respect
> both by creating some kind of common guidelines / shared space especially
> for this kind of activity. For example, if we were to create a separate
> OWASP Industry Consortium, a 501(c)6 partner organization for this type of
> activity. I'd be happy to help with incorporation an OWASP Industry
> Consortium, 501(c)6 if possible? Thoughts?
>
> Bev
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Eoin Keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> We tried invite based meeting with industry representatives like a "lunch
>> and learn" but for reps to talk freely NDA's would be required which is
>> deemed against our radical openness.
>>
>> This CISO project is good (engagement) and the  survey was developed by
>> myself and others to assist with industry engagement. I'm unsure what the
>> "next step" is after that....this survey was to help guide owasp interns of
>> industry relevance but I'm unsure if that is still the aim, best ask
>> Tobias/Marco.
>>
>> Production quality projects certainly shall help with industry engagement
>> but unsure if we will ever be industry quality and the last 20% of
>> production quality stuff is always very difficult to achieve and maintain.
>>
>> If you are in Denver next week id love to have a beer with people
>> involved to talk this through :)
>>
>>
>> Eoin Keary
>> Owasp Global Board
>> +353 87 977 2988
>>
>>
>> On 11 Sep 2014, at 18:41, Bev Corwin <bev.corwin at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>> Dear Eoin,
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> All is open for discussion at this stage. I'm just trying to reboot
>> efforts as requested and happy to work together to help define scope and
>> focus. Thanks for your enthusiasm! What do you think that our "Go to Market
>> Plan" should look like? Best wishes.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Bev
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Eoin Keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Owasp-leaders] OWASP Global Industry Committee
>>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi Bev,
>>> Is the goal to engage with industry or standards groups or ?
>>> Engagement with industry ties tightly to our projects and edu material
>>> IMHO.
>>> What's the "go to market plan" If i may ask? Very keen for the committee
>>> to work!!
>>>
>>> Eoin Keary
>>> Owasp Global Board
>>> +353 87 977 2988
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20140911/7120b229/attachment.html>


More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list