[Owasp-leaders] our mail server is better )) (Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

Timur 'x' Khrotko (owasp) timur at owasp.org
Mon Oct 27 23:27:17 UTC 2014


Dear Matt,

I meant what I wrote: our mail servers are better then their ones. :)

(I use/admin gapps since the beginning, and I like OWASP using this
facility!)

Cheers!
timur

Ps: Actually the addressee was their admin (with a very non-technical
issue). If anyone knows how to notify Robert about their given technical
issue, please!
On Oct 27, 2014 10:56 PM, "Matt Tesauro" <matt.tesauro at owasp.org> wrote:

> "our" mail server is the mail servers provided by Google for our Google
> Apps account for the OWASP Foundation.
>
> So, its not something we have particularly granular control of.
>
> Also, as I read your forward,
> [snip]
> > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server
> for the recipient domainwebappsec.orgbymail.webappsec.org.
> [199.47.222.151].
> >
> > The error that the other server returned was:
> > 454 4.7.0 TLS not available due to local problem
> [snip]
>
> It seems to me that this error is indicating a lack of TLS from
> mail.webappsec.org.  That is a domain which is not owned or controlled by
> the OWASP Foundation:
> http://reports.internic.net/cgi/whois?whois_nic=webappsec.org&type=domain
>
> So there's not too much we can actually do based on this error.
>
> --
> -- Matt Tesauro
> OWASP WTE Project Lead
> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Live_CD_Project
> http://AppSecLive.org - Community and Download site
> OWASP OpenStack Security Project Lead
> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_OpenStack_Security_Project
>
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Timur 'x' Khrotko (owasp) <
> timur at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> isn't it!? :)
>>
>> (xxxxx = censored by me)
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Mail Delivery Subsystem" <mailer-daemon at googlemail.com>
>> Date: Oct 26, 2014 11:57 PM
>> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>> To: <timur at owasp.org>
>> Cc:
>>
>> > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>> >
>> >      xxxxx at webappsec.org
>> >
>> > Technical details of permanent failure:
>> > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server
>> for the recipient domainwebappsec.orgbymail.webappsec.org.
>> [199.47.222.151].
>> >
>> > The error that the other server returned was:
>> > 454 4.7.0 TLS not available due to local problem
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original message -----
>> >
>> > X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>> >         d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
>> >
>> h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
>> >          :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
>> >         bh=PiIq+vHqRFC7e7dyDA0DtzB/Szc3QhpjYgbguk40kLE=;
>> >
>> b=frLMScY3Vsch5ioGbAHk0b9oES9V5jkKEo2S5y4QtzxcmgCO/p/OoDbwvtCg4qe2+g
>> >
>>  WaQvV3jvnQBLYBgO1jXuvEmL3l9d+AR3wXdDzvjCluqV2qEqRTqygnmAo3a6AELJbWGH
>> >
>>  vZxY3PtexuN5t0kg/Ny0uLsIZpw4H19DbJeAYUBpww7+r6as/oJ4hJQrhyqM96Zi3afD
>> >
>>  xnZtZwHdRUEgAA1S2vCgPRfoBbcQ3iEPUoitfVZzrG1sh34QO/DmALkDrbSl4+ELO7pO
>> >
>>  qohWeG+m36QjVh9yGrBryZ6JVmVUDhn4Gk9MhF1j4FkH5MTRlAB4p532K5tu0q74tEVq
>> >          VIRQ==
>> > X-Gm-Message-State:
>> ALoCoQnC3G21qP21i8OFQ8uaPjHDAq55cFu1zZ7/T3yixkPJfzkQonAaACFu4XMRXvMI90Nd2V6y
>> > X-Received: by 10.170.116.203 with SMTP id
>> i194mr613059ykb.52.1414086427577;
>> >  Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
>> > MIME-Version: 1.0
>> > Received: by 10.140.107.70 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:46:47 -0700
>> (PDT)
>> > In-Reply-To: <
>> CAKD22CBoggm1nLaiwQKHEXs+e-nYUacXyzkGhA9AA49B207jPQ at mail.gmail.com>
>> > References: <003e01cfebdf$255e5fd0$9b7a6fd5 at pc> <
>> CAKD22CBoggm1nLaiwQKHEXs+e-nYUacXyzkGhA9AA49B207jPQ at mail.gmail.com>
>> > From: "Timur X. kHrotko" <timur at owasp.org>
>> > Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 19:46:47 +0200
>> > Message-ID: <CANcPVLfmmyM0a7ot+K+Q0CM0y7Vc=
>> 7vE1BHk+R-N9pqOwW_gvQ at mail.gmail.com>
>> > Subject: xxxxxx
>> > ----- Message truncated -----
>> >
>>
>> This message may contain confidential information - you should handle it
>> accordingly.
>>
>
>

-- 
This message may contain confidential information - you should handle it 
accordingly.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20141028/eaf95d7d/attachment.html>


More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list