[Owasp-leaders] [Owasp-community] [Owasp-board] ...CandidateNamesUpdate

johanna curiel curiel johanna.curiel at owasp.org
Mon Jul 21 22:20:47 UTC 2014


 >she didn't talk anti infragard trash...should have been talking trash in
front of former infragard

Who are u talking about? Keep in mind this REALLY FEEL
OFFENSIVE...especially for female members, including myself.

Talking cryptically? What is this?


On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Yvan Boily <yvanboily at gmail.com> wrote:

> You are someone who is comfortable with calling a person offensive names
> on a public list, which is roughly all I need to know about you for the
> moment.  Thanks for doing your part to increase the quality of discourse on
> this list.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Donald <don.gooden at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  No...wrong Veteran wrong joke...
>>
>> Period...
>>
>> Know who you are talking too...it was to low bar of a
>> stunt...period...low class and I was I rate...and to be correct she didn't
>> talk anti infragard trash...should have been talking trash in front of
>> former infragard,  but get the dictionary out and look up I rate...
>>
>> Enjoy it..
>>
>> D
>>
>> Pps
>>
>> Re replied(had to remove one of the email groups)
>>  ------------------------------
>> From: Yvan Boily <yvanboily at gmail.com>
>> Sent: ‎7/‎21/‎2014 2:36 AM
>> To: Donald <don.gooden at gmail.com>
>> Cc: Eoin Keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org>; Timur 'x' Khrotko (owasp)
>> <timur at owasp.org>; OWASP Foundation Board List
>> <owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>; owasp-community at lists.owasp.org;
>> owasp-leaders at lists.owasp.org
>> Subject: Re: [Owasp-community] [Owasp-leaders] [Owasp-board]
>> ...CandidateNamesUpdate
>>
>> So um, this is usually the reason you should stay off email when you are
>> drunk.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Donald <don.gooden at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  That retarded chick at the time end just bunked the hope conf...rapped
>>> in selipheion and talking anti infragard trash....tried to just hope help
>>> and smile..and
>>>
>>> Rank and file...
>>>
>>> Bunk
>>>
>>> D
>>>  ------------------------------
>>> From: Eoin Keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org>
>>> Sent: ‎7/‎18/‎2014 4:17 PM
>>> To: Timur 'x' Khrotko (owasp) <timur at owasp.org>
>>> Cc: OWASP Foundation Board List <owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>;
>>> owasp-community at lists.owasp.org; owasp-leaders at lists.owasp.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Owasp-community] [Owasp-leaders] [Owasp-board]
>>> ...CandidateNames Update
>>>
>>>  Best of luck!!
>>>
>>> Eoin Keary
>>> Owasp Global Board
>>> +353 87 977 2988
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18 Jul 2014, at 20:47, "Timur 'x' Khrotko (owasp)" <timur at owasp.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  I plan to nominate myself. I thought August 11 is the deadline, now I
>>> see it is better to register as candidate early... ,)
>>> On Jul 18, 2014 9:43 PM, "Eoin Keary" <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  ......when  did the process change from Open the Closed? It was open
>>>> 2 elections ago and before...i memory serves....There was no publicised
>>>> decision to make the nominee list closed....was there?
>>>>
>>>> Opening the list is not a process change, like really? what effect
>>>> shall it have apart from the "surprise" factor after call for nominees is
>>>> closed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Eoin Keary
>>>> Owasp Global Board
>>>> +353 87 977 2988
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 18 Jul 2014, at 20:31, Tobias <tobias.gondrom at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  I agree with Josh in both points (should be open, but not to change
>>>> an election process mid-way unless this agreed unanimously by all
>>>> candidates).
>>>>
>>>> And there is no need to change the rules mid-way of this election.
>>>> Any candidate is free to announce her/himself that she/he is running at
>>>> any time.
>>>>
>>>> Best wishes, Tobias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ps.: and we can discuss for next year whether and how we should change
>>>> the procedure.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 18/07/14 20:14, Josh Sokol wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Sarah stated that they got more candidates by not announcing it in
>>>> advance because some people might not want to run if they perceive that
>>>> there are other qualified candidates.  That was the operations team
>>>> rationale at least and they seemed to have data to support it.  Ultimately,
>>>> I agree that our elections should be open, but I don't think we should
>>>> change the rules mid-way through the process unless we have full buy-in
>>>> from all participants.
>>>>
>>>> ~josh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Paolo Perego <thesp0nge at owasp.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The O still stands for open?
>>>>> Il 18/lug/2014 21:00 "Eoin Keary" <eoin.keary at owasp.org> ha scritto:
>>>>>
>>>>>  +1
>>>>>> Makes no sense.
>>>>>> And no reason for secrecy given.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eoin Keary
>>>>>> Owasp Global Board
>>>>>> +353 87 977 2988
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 18 Jul 2014, at 19:46, johanna curiel curiel <
>>>>>> johanna.curiel at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Normally in an election process, candidates will go out there and
>>>>>> do promotion..(political campaign can I call it?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But in this case i don't understand why the names where kept hidden,
>>>>>> its so contradictory to an election vote process that I actually don't
>>>>>> understand this decisions at all...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Simon,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am indeed running for the board again. Kelly recently asked me and
>>>>>>> the other candidates if it was ok to change the current policy. I let Kelly
>>>>>>> know that I am ok (and prefer) transparency over this issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aloha,
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jim Manico
>>>>>>> @Manicode
>>>>>>> (808) 652-3805
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 18, 2014, at 4:03 AM, psiinon <psiinon at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      So far the Poll <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Polls> shows
>>>>>>> a fairly even split between the yes, no and maybe responses as to whether
>>>>>>> people would vote for someone who was not prepared to announce their
>>>>>>> candidacy in advance.
>>>>>>> This would appear to indicate that publicly announcing your
>>>>>>> intention to stand for the OWASP board would be advantageous.
>>>>>>> Obviously you shouldnt make decisions just based on polls like this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However I'm going to make my own position very clear.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will not be standing for the board this year.
>>>>>>> And I will NOT be voting for any of the candidates who do not
>>>>>>> announce their candidacy prior to August 19.
>>>>>>> If that means I am not able to vote for any of the candidates then
>>>>>>> so be it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Simon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Kelly Santalucia <
>>>>>>> kelly.santalucia at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Members of the OWASP Community,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I wanted to give you an updated on OWASP releasing the candidate
>>>>>>>> names for the upcoming 2014 Board of Elections.
>>>>>>>> <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/2014_Board_Elections>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All candidates were sent an email earlier this week asking if they
>>>>>>>> would support OWASP releasing their candidacy prior to August 19.
>>>>>>>> <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/2014_Board_Elections#Election_Timeline>
>>>>>>>>  Out of the 7 candidates, one replied "I am indifferent to a
>>>>>>>> policy change at this point. If you opt to change the policy of releasing
>>>>>>>> candidates names, I will go along with it."  and the other asked for
>>>>>>>> his/her candidacy to be retracted. I have personally reached out
>>>>>>>> to the remaining 5 candidates again asking for their thoughts.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As of now, we will not be releasing the names until all candidates
>>>>>>>> have replied, and they all need to be in favor of it.  No where is it noted
>>>>>>>> that the candidates can not announce their candidacy on their own via
>>>>>>>> social media, etc. prior to August 19.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am happy to reevaluate our current election model for the 2015
>>>>>>>> election.  If you would like to be a part of this discussion, please let
>>>>>>>> me know.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kindest Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>  *Kelly Santalucia*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Membership and Business Liaison*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *OWASP Foundation*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *1200-C Agora Drive, #232*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> [The entire original message is not included.]
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Owasp-community mailing list
>>> Owasp-community at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-community
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-community mailing list
> Owasp-community at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20140721/02f405a5/attachment.html>


More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list