[Owasp-leaders] [Owasp-community] [Owasp-board] ...CandidateNames Update

Yvan Boily yvanboily at gmail.com
Mon Jul 21 06:36:16 UTC 2014


So um, this is usually the reason you should stay off email when you are
drunk.




On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Donald <don.gooden at gmail.com> wrote:

>  That retarded chick at the time end just bunked the hope conf...rapped
> in selipheion and talking anti infragard trash....tried to just hope help
> and smile..and
>
> Rank and file...
>
> Bunk
>
> D
>  ------------------------------
> From: Eoin Keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org>
> Sent: ‎7/‎18/‎2014 4:17 PM
> To: Timur 'x' Khrotko (owasp) <timur at owasp.org>
> Cc: OWASP Foundation Board List <owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>;
> owasp-community at lists.owasp.org; owasp-leaders at lists.owasp.org
> Subject: Re: [Owasp-community] [Owasp-leaders] [Owasp-board]
> ...CandidateNames Update
>
> Best of luck!!
>
> Eoin Keary
> Owasp Global Board
> +353 87 977 2988
>
>
> On 18 Jul 2014, at 20:47, "Timur 'x' Khrotko (owasp)" <timur at owasp.org>
> wrote:
>
>  I plan to nominate myself. I thought August 11 is the deadline, now I
> see it is better to register as candidate early... ,)
> On Jul 18, 2014 9:43 PM, "Eoin Keary" <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>>  ......when  did the process change from Open the Closed? It was open 2
>> elections ago and before...i memory serves....There was no publicised
>> decision to make the nominee list closed....was there?
>>
>> Opening the list is not a process change, like really? what effect shall
>> it have apart from the "surprise" factor after call for nominees is closed.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Eoin Keary
>> Owasp Global Board
>> +353 87 977 2988
>>
>>
>> On 18 Jul 2014, at 20:31, Tobias <tobias.gondrom at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>  I agree with Josh in both points (should be open, but not to change an
>> election process mid-way unless this agreed unanimously by all candidates).
>>
>> And there is no need to change the rules mid-way of this election.
>> Any candidate is free to announce her/himself that she/he is running at
>> any time.
>>
>> Best wishes, Tobias
>>
>>
>> Ps.: and we can discuss for next year whether and how we should change
>> the procedure.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 18/07/14 20:14, Josh Sokol wrote:
>>
>>  Sarah stated that they got more candidates by not announcing it in
>> advance because some people might not want to run if they perceive that
>> there are other qualified candidates.  That was the operations team
>> rationale at least and they seemed to have data to support it.  Ultimately,
>> I agree that our elections should be open, but I don't think we should
>> change the rules mid-way through the process unless we have full buy-in
>> from all participants.
>>
>> ~josh
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Paolo Perego <thesp0nge at owasp.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The O still stands for open?
>>> Il 18/lug/2014 21:00 "Eoin Keary" <eoin.keary at owasp.org> ha scritto:
>>>
>>>  +1
>>>> Makes no sense.
>>>> And no reason for secrecy given.
>>>>
>>>> Eoin Keary
>>>> Owasp Global Board
>>>> +353 87 977 2988
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 18 Jul 2014, at 19:46, johanna curiel curiel <
>>>> johanna.curiel at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Normally in an election process, candidates will go out there and do
>>>> promotion..(political campaign can I call it?)
>>>>
>>>> But in this case i don't understand why the names where kept hidden,
>>>> its so contradictory to an election vote process that I actually don't
>>>> understand this decisions at all...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Simon,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am indeed running for the board again. Kelly recently asked me and
>>>>> the other candidates if it was ok to change the current policy. I let Kelly
>>>>> know that I am ok (and prefer) transparency over this issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Aloha,
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jim Manico
>>>>> @Manicode
>>>>> (808) 652-3805
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 18, 2014, at 4:03 AM, psiinon <psiinon at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>      So far the Poll <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Polls> shows a
>>>>> fairly even split between the yes, no and maybe responses as to whether
>>>>> people would vote for someone who was not prepared to announce their
>>>>> candidacy in advance.
>>>>> This would appear to indicate that publicly announcing your intention
>>>>> to stand for the OWASP board would be advantageous.
>>>>> Obviously you shouldnt make decisions just based on polls like this.
>>>>>
>>>>> However I'm going to make my own position very clear.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will not be standing for the board this year.
>>>>> And I will NOT be voting for any of the candidates who do not announce
>>>>> their candidacy prior to August 19.
>>>>> If that means I am not able to vote for any of the candidates then so
>>>>> be it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>>  Simon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Kelly Santalucia <
>>>>> kelly.santalucia at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  Members of the OWASP Community,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wanted to give you an updated on OWASP releasing the candidate
>>>>>> names for the upcoming 2014 Board of Elections.
>>>>>> <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/2014_Board_Elections>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All candidates were sent an email earlier this week asking if they
>>>>>> would support OWASP releasing their candidacy prior to August 19.
>>>>>> <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/2014_Board_Elections#Election_Timeline>
>>>>>>  Out of the 7 candidates, one replied "I am indifferent to a policy
>>>>>> change at this point. If you opt to change the policy of releasing
>>>>>> candidates names, I will go along with it."  and the other asked for
>>>>>> his/her candidacy to be retracted. I have personally reached out to
>>>>>> the remaining 5 candidates again asking for their thoughts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As of now, we will not be releasing the names until all candidates
>>>>>> have replied, and they all need to be in favor of it.  No where is it noted
>>>>>> that the candidates can not announce their candidacy on their own via
>>>>>> social media, etc. prior to August 19.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am happy to reevaluate our current election model for the 2015
>>>>>> election.  If you would like to be a part of this discussion, please let
>>>>>> me know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kindest Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>  *Kelly Santalucia*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Membership and Business Liaison*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *OWASP Foundation*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *1200-C Agora Drive, #232*
>>>>>>
>>>>>
> [The entire original message is not included.]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-community mailing list
> Owasp-community at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20140720/2122c480/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list