dinis.cruz at owasp.org
Thu Jan 9 19:58:16 UTC 2014
Yeah that RSA answer is quite out of order. Is that published somewhere? It
would be good to have a public record of how they reacted
On 9 Jan 2014 19:43, "Jim Manico" <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
> OWASP Leaders,
> Among many reasons, one being that Eoin and I are co-authors, I am going
> to follow his lead and pull way from the RSA conference training.
> This was a difficult decision and I am not happy at how this all went
> down. Again, I think we need to apply this same kind of judgement evenly.
> Frankly, I was very positive on doing the RSA training up until we
> received their response asking us to cease-and-desist from talking to
> BSsides and asking Eoin for a retraction. I can't say that I blame them,
> but it made it clear to me that we we either need to do the co-marketing
> and training, or walk away from both.
> Jim Manico
> OWASP Board Member
> (808) 652-3805
> > OWASP leaders,
> > I've decided to pull my delivery of training from the RSA conference.
> > I don't believe supporting in organisation who tries to control other
> organisations (whom they talk to) or is allegedly involved with weak
> crypto/NSA conspiracy is good for the foundation.
> > I also request that OWASP pull the plug on any involvement with RSA for
> > Sorry I this upsets some people. I was voted (as a board member) to
> lead by you and I am trying to do just that.
> > Eoin Keary
> > Owasp Global Board
> > +353 87 977 2988
> > _______________________________________________
> > OWASP-Leaders mailing list
> > OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
> > https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OWASP-Leaders