[Owasp-leaders] RSA conditions on training
seba at owasp.org
Thu Jan 9 13:26:01 UTC 2014
I responded to this: "No, we should never accept any such restrictions".
But this seems a no-brainer in the context of our core values and
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:13 PM, psiinon <psiinon at gmail.com> wrote:
> When I created the OWASP Polls page I assumed we would only have one poll
> at a time.
> But I think its important to react quickly to changing circumstances, and
> as I think this is a really important question I've started another OWASP
> Is it acceptable for organizations to place restrictions on OWASP
> presenting any material at any other events?<https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Polls>
> It will run for one week, and once again will only be accessible to people
> with OWASP email addresses.
> As stated on the page (not that anyone reads it;): "If you ask for the
> form to be shared with you from a non OWASP address then you will just get
> a canned response explaining why this will not currently happen."
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Eoin Keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
>> RSA require us to stop talks with BsidesSF on relation to setting
>> something up with them and also I need to issue an public apology to them
>> over twitter regarding my tweet:
>> "@EoinKeary: @owasp are pulling the plug on @RSAConference. Our training
>> may be delivered via @SecurityBSides"
>> in order for OWASP to deliver training at RSA this year.
>> I'm not keen on either of these conditions. Thoughts?
>> Eoin Keary
>> Owasp Global Board
>> +353 87 977 2988
>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
> OWASP ZAP <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/ZAP> Project leader
> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OWASP-Leaders