[Owasp-leaders] "Is it me or has the OWASP website just fallen into disarray?"

Eoin eoin.keary at owasp.org
Sun Mar 10 21:06:35 UTC 2013


Cheat sheets (finished ones) should be pdf'ed
Similar to guides and other good info.
All put in one place ala iBooks


Eoin Keary
Owasp Global Board
+353 87 977 2988


On 10 Mar 2013, at 20:10, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:

> I feel the wiki is critical for collaboration.
> 
> But a disorganized wiki is poor for information dissemination (which
> is the core of our mission : awareness).
> 
> I think we will always need a wiki.
> 
> But a "static" set of organized pages that links into the wiki will
> make it dramatically easier to absorb our
> content.
> 
> This dual-approach should address all of your concerns, Dennis.
> 
> --
> Jim Manico
> @Manicode
> (808) 652-3805
> 
> On Mar 10, 2013, at 8:30 PM, Dennis Groves <dennis.groves at owasp.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 10 Mar 2013, at 19:09, Jim Manico wrote:
>> 
>>> Simon,
>>> 
>>> I think this is a very fair comment from the community.
>> 
>> It depends Jim. Clearly wiki is the lowest barrier of entry to
>> contribution, and is the leading tool for knowledge management. However,
>> as you are well aware - the OWASP community is not just the contributors
>> it is also the consumers. And the consumers want a CMS; because that is
>> a better tool for consumption.
>> 
>> So we actually have a dilemma, based on the perspective of the different
>> needs and requirements of two different communities; one of the consumer
>> and the other of the content creators.
>> 
>> Now the other dilemma is that of the 1-9-90 rule of social media; and
>> OWASP is deeply effected by it. Which is to say:
>> 
>> 1% Leaders & Visionaries
>> 9% Creators & Contributors
>> 90% Consumers
>> 
>> We have estimated around 32k? people in the community at large; and yet
>> we have only 200 (set 320) active visionaries; and I would also guess
>> that we have nothing close to 3200 contributors. Which is to say that we
>> have very real problems with barriers to participation; because even the
>> math says that we should be doing better on average.
>> 
>>> I feel we need (this is just my opinion as a volunteer) two major
>>> initiatives:
>>> 
>>> 1) A new homepage
>> 
>> I don't disagree with those goals, but see my comments above - I imagine
>> this stuff solves itself in short order if we can solve the root issues
>> that prevent people from just doing what they obviously want to do so
>> much that they complain about not being able to do it. ;-)
>> 
>>> 2) A major cleanup of the wiki; primarily deprecating old content,
>>> secondary a little reorganization.
>> 
>> A great example supporting my beliefs is the major clean up of the
>> projects area of the wiki. This was done by a single person; who had
>> *zero* experience with wiki technology before they started reorganising
>> the OWASP projects page.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> What are your thoughts?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Dennis
>> 
>> --
>> [Dennis Groves](http://about.me/dennis.groves), MSc
>> [Email me](mailto:dennis.groves at owasp.org) or [schedule a
>> meeting](http://goo.gl/8sPIy).
>> 
>> *This email is licensed under a [CC BY-ND
>> 3.0](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/deed.en_GB) license.*
>> 
>> **Please do not send me Microsoft Office/Apple iWork documents.**
>> Send [OpenDocument](http://fsf.org/campaigns/opendocument/) instead!
>> Stand up for your freedom to install [free
>> software](http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot/statement).
>> 
>>> The idea that some lives matter less is the root of all that’s wrong
>>> with the world. -- Paul Farmer
> _______________________________________________
> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders


More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list