[Owasp-leaders] [Governance] Membership funds

Dennis Groves dennis.groves at owasp.org
Tue Jun 11 18:56:20 UTC 2013

On 11 Jun 2013, at 9:40, Sarah Baso wrote:

> I agree that this is an ok approach that would make it much easier for
> projects and chapters to access funds. So where would the funding for 
> these
> "buckets" come from? Should we eliminate some of the other funding
> designations in the budget?
> Open to ideas...

I think it makes sense from an operations stand point as well because 
there would be less to manage; if all the money was designated for 
'community development' and perhaps as many as a dozen active 
participants were drawing from that bucket - you still have much less 
work than carving it up into 193 chapters and 158 projects and managing 
each like a separate bank account.

[Dennis Groves](http://about.me/dennis.groves), MSc
[Email me](mailto:dennis.groves at owasp.org) or [schedule a 

> "Unless someone like you...cares a whole awful lot...nothing is going 
> to get better...It's not." -- The Lorax

More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list