[Owasp-leaders] [Governance] Membership funds

Dennis Groves dennis.groves at owasp.org
Thu Jun 6 19:21:51 UTC 2013


My bad - same idea; the position is for a chapters co-ordinator!

for the geeks among you "s/conference/chapter/g"

:)

On 6 Jun 2013, at 12:12, Sarah Baso wrote:

> Dennis -
> One point of clarification re  #1 - this funding isn't to hire a 
> conference
> manager (there is already funding that has been approved for that. One 
> of
> the additional items that needs funding is another FT position for 
> Chapters
> (Chapters Coordinator).....
>
>
> Sarah
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Dennis Groves 
> <dennis.groves at owasp.org>wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> We should be removing bureaucracy not creating it. The money is there 
>> for
>> the purposes of *enabling* the community.
>>
>> We have two issues that should be kept very separate:
>>
>> 1) Are the chapters (need a plan) willing to foot the bill to hire a
>> conference director? I think most chapters would be willing to 
>> participate
>> in this because it is so vital to the communities continued 
>> existence.
>>
>> 2) Do we want to change the policy on the split between the chapters 
>> and
>> the organisation? I don't think we are ready to tell a good story 
>> about how
>> and why we should do this; unless it looks a great deal like what 
>> Dinis
>> proposed.  More thinking needs to be done, before we open this up for 
>> wider
>> discussions.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dennis

-- 
[Dennis Groves](http://about.me/dennis.groves), MSc
[Email me](mailto:dennis.groves at owasp.org) or [schedule a 
meeting](http://goo.gl/8sPIy).

> "Unless someone like you...cares a whole awful lot...nothing is going 
> to get better...It's not." -- The Lorax


More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list