[Owasp-leaders] OWASP Top 10 - 2013 Release Candidate Now Available
konstantinos at owasp.org
Tue Feb 19 20:19:54 UTC 2013
Time is more "expensive" than actual money. If Aspect is allowing Dave to work on the Top10 during the hours that he should be working for clients, they have all the right to place their logo somewhere. It would very kind of them and appreciated if they didnt require this but I totally understand if they do require it. Same goes for all other projects and leaders.
On 19 Φεβ 2013, at 16:35, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
> Everyone contributes time to projects. If "time spent on projects" is enough of a
> criteria for logo sponsorship, then all projects would be littered with corporate logos like NASDAR drivers, something that is clearly against event a loose interpretation of our guidelines.
> Aspect did not pay for project sponsorship, this is a "time invested" trade, which does not at all give them the right to have their logo on the project.
> But hey, Dave is a reasonable chap and I want to give him a chance to do the right thing. He might just be using the template from 2010.
> As for the "closed project", that is another matter. I am also concerned that the current revision going around is a PDF. Wiki or at least Google docs is more appropriate.
> Jim Manico
> (808) 652-3805
> On Feb 19, 2013, at 11:22 PM, Eoin <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
>> little emotive. Please everyone be cool.
>> Re the top 10, it is obvious Aspect have put significant time into this document. I feel their chargeable time should be recognised in some way. -fair?
>> I don't remember the project asking for volunteers which is a concern for me. It seems the top 10 is a "closed shop".
>> Many many organisations could of (if asked) contributed to the stats to deliver the top 10 which would if increased the sample space for the statistical model. -that is my concern.
>> Eoin Keary
>> Owasp Global Board
>> +353 87 977 2988
>> On 19 Feb 2013, at 13:51, "Dennis Groves" <dennis.groves at owasp.org> wrote:
>>> On 19 Feb 2013, at 22:34, Tom Brennan wrote:
>>> Here let me help you Dennis/Jim with intent.
>>> Tom - don't even get what you are on about?
>>> Marijuana is illegal at a federal level, state laws do not supersede the federal law, unless the federal government gives up that power to the states. Similarly, OWASP (look under integrity - it is a CORE OWASP value…) foundation rules apply even to projects, a separate policy for projects is not required.
>>> Dennis Groves, MSc
>>> Email me or schedule a meeting.
>>> This email is licensed under a CC BY-ND 3.0 license.
>>> Please do not send me Microsoft Office/Apple iWork documents.
>>> Send OpenDocument instead!
>>> Stand up for your freedom to install free software.
>>> The idea that some lives matter less is the root of all that’s wrong with the world. -- Paul Farmer
>>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OWASP-Leaders