[Owasp-leaders] Moving to Global Initiatives Program & Retiring Committee Structure

Jim Manico jim.manico at owasp.org
Tue Feb 19 02:32:45 UTC 2013


How about you take point on a new Global Initiative to review and expand on the vendor neutrality guidelines. I'll help.


> On 18 Feb 2013, at 22:53, Eoin wrote:
>> As a board member it think it is only correct to say that
>> Dissolving a committee is only in name. For example the Industry
>> committee
>> is active, energetic and has an impressive cast of members.
>> I certainly don't think such a grouping of people should disbanded due to
>> their "Banner" being dissolved.
>> After all OWASP is just people, does not matter what team or group or
>> committee you are involved in. You can do (nearly) anything you want and
>> have the time to do it.
> Great points, but the 'nearly' anything is exactly what needs to be
> worked out. For example the 'Ethics' thread has a wealth of proposed
> 'rules for engagement' with OWASP; many of which seem like common sense
> and just plain good behaviour. But obviously not all board members agree
> since some are behaving incongruent with the mission of the organisation...

More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list