[Owasp-leaders] [SAMM] Fwd: ISO/IEC 27034

Yvan Boily yvanboily at gmail.com
Sat Aug 24 09:47:29 UTC 2013

commercial interests, not instance.  bleh, still travelling back from

On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Yvan Boily <yvanboily at gmail.com> wrote:

> > The best way to have an official access to the working draft will be that
>> > OWASP ask to have an official liaison with ISO/SC27. In that way, OWASP
>> will
>> > be alloud to provide official comments ond contribution to the project.
>> By
>> > the way, other ISO standard projects may also be interesting for OWASP.
>> I do not believe OWASP (as an organisation) can ever contribute
>> resources and other effort to work that is against the principle of
>> "free & open". At least that is my understanding.
> I strongly disagree.  Open projects and organizations can easily
> contribute to closed standards, and in fact, such participation is required
> if an Open organization is to remain relevant in a field dominated by
> commercial instance.
> The flag in the ground should be on our contributions and the work we
> produce; those in the discussion of , and discussion of the contributions
> that OWASP members make can remain open, even if the standard is closed.
> If we have a chance to get a seat at the table we owe it to our community
> to speak for them.
> Cheers,
> Yvan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20130824/9bd3289f/attachment.html>

More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list