[Owasp-leaders] Why I don't vote and neither should you...
Eric Sheridan
eric.sheridan at owasp.org
Tue Nov 6 01:12:32 UTC 2012
VOTE RON PAUL!!
Sorry... wrong thread :)
Sincerely,
Eric Sheridan
(twitter) @eric_sheridan
(blog) http://ericsheridan.blogspot.com
On 11/5/12 7:50 PM, Dennis Groves wrote:
> Eoin,
>
> Thank you for your respectful reply.
>
> Obviously, I do make reference to "American politics" - and it is
> election day Tuesday in the USA.
>
> However, I also think OWASP is a very progressive community, and I
> constantly think about how we can make it better. I am not saying the
> OWASP elections are rigged, or false or invalid or than anything
> untoward is going on; I do however think that there is substantial
> scientific literature proving that voting actually does not work; at
> least not the way we are taught to believe it does.
>
> I don't have any solutions, as I am not a political scientist. However,
> I am very excited about the ideas presented in Open Source Democracy
> <http://scriptogr.am/dennis-groves/post/open-source-democracy>,
> Bettermeans <https://github.com/Bettermeans/bettermeans> and the OWASP
> Initiatives.
> <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Initiatives_Global_Strategic_Focus>
> They all seem to be very practical solutions that improve the community
> through greater contribution and participation. I often wonder what the
> Romans would have come up with if they would have had access to the
> technology that we do.
>
> Dennis
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Eoin <eoin.keary at owasp.org
> <mailto:eoin.keary at owasp.org>> wrote:
>
> For me, I live in a republic. People died so I could vote. That's
> what drives me. But I don't think political debate is a place on an
> OWASP list. Fair?
>
>
> Eoin Keary
> Owasp Global Board
> +353 87 977 2988 <tel:%2B353%2087%20977%202988>
>
>
> On 5 Nov 2012, at 22:33, Yvan Boily <yvanboily at gmail.com
> <mailto:yvanboily at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dennis,
>>
>> I don't know if anyone followed up off list, and I thought about
>> not responding, but your post is still bugging me several days later.
>>
>> I understand all of the different reasons why someone shouldn't
>> vote, or why the democratic system in most countries that allow
>> elections are flawed, and to be honest, as a Canadian watching the
>> US election, it is, for me, a spectator sport (sadly, since our
>> economy is closely tied to the US economy in many ways).
>>
>> The problem is very neatly summed up by Winston Churchill in his
>> speech in 1947 "/No one pretends that democracy is perfect or
>> all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst
>> form of government except all those other forms that have been
>> tried from time to time./"
>>
>> My problem with it is that the people are presented with an
>> opportunity to influence change through a vote, and as flawed a
>> system as it is, it, along with the courts, provide the only
>> mechanisms that can be used to select leadership and affect
>> policy. If all of the smart people who understand how to apply
>> game theory and are aware of the shenanigans fail to get involved
>> and motivate people, then ultimately all of the not-so-smart
>> people who can be swayed by talking points and stump speeches will
>> be the mass that choose the direction of the government.
>>
>> I know the US election is tomorrow, and new information or
>> activity at this point would be ineffective, but it is just not
>> practical to sit on the side-lines and argue against the system.
>> If you have the right to vote, you owe it to all of the people who
>> don't have that right to exercise it, no matter how flawed the
>> system is. You don't have to be a politician, but there is more
>> to democratic society than just casting a vote; for the society to
>> thrive it requires in engaging in political discourse with friends
>> and family, and promoting and living the ideals that its members
>> would aspire to, and it takes smart, principled people engaging in
>> the political process.
>>
>> Sometimes it is good to leave the academic discussions in the
>> Ivory Tower, do the practical thing, and go out and vote!
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Dennis Groves
>> <dennis.groves at owasp.org <mailto:dennis.groves at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>
>> http://scriptogr.am/dennis-groves/post/why-i-dont-vote-and-neither-should-you.
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Dennis Groves <http://about.me/dennis.groves>, MSc
>> dennis.groves at owasp.org <mailto:dennis.groves at owasp.org>
>>
>> <http://www.owasp.org/>
>>
>> /This work is licensed under the Creative Commons
>> Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To
>> view a copy of this license, visit
>> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ or send a
>> letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900,
>> Mountain View, California, 94041, USA./
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
>> <mailto:OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org>
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org <mailto:OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org>
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Dennis Groves <http://about.me/dennis.groves>, MSc
> dennis.groves at owasp.org <mailto:dennis.groves at owasp.org>
>
> <http://www.owasp.org/>
>
> /This work is licensed under the Creative Commons
> Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy
> of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
> or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900,
> Mountain View, California, 94041, USA./
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
>
More information about the OWASP-Leaders
mailing list