[Owasp-leaders] Why it's ok to pay leaders

Kenneth Van Wyk ken at krvw.com
Thu Apr 12 14:08:30 UTC 2012


OK, gotta chime in. I've followed this thread, and frankly, I can't even imagine why it's up for discussion.

If OWASP has money to fund a project/event/whatever, AND

Bidding on that funded effort is open to all, AND

There is a fair and equitable selection process, with appropriate checks and balances, removal of conflicts of interest, AND

An OWASP Leader happens to be selected, THEN

It's a win for everyone.

OWASP gets the effort from the person(s) selected.

The selected person(s) gets revenue for his/her efforts.

I mean, DUH! Why aren't we all doing a face-palm over this non-issue?

Please explain what I'm missing here.

Cheers,

Ken van Wyk


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2252 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20120412/5b04c029/attachment.bin>


More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list