[Owasp-leaders] Thomas Ryan - OWASP - OccupyWallStreet - Gawker
Chris Schmidt
chris.schmidt at owasp.org
Sun Oct 16 22:20:04 EDT 2011
"There's no such thing as bad press" - I firmly agree with this
sentiment (having been in the entertainment biz for 7 years), however
damaging inaccurate press should be avoided wherever possible.
On 10/16/2011 8:17 PM, Stephen Craig Evans wrote:
> I'm with Dennis. Can we get them to put in a link to our home page?
>
> Stephen
>
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Dennis Groves
> <dennis.groves at owasp.org <mailto:dennis.groves at owasp.org>> wrote:
>
> Actually, IMHO - although it is not so flattering for Tom; *any*
> mention of OWASP in the mainstream press is *public awareness* -
> and that my friends is something we can not even begin to quantify
> the value of.
>
>
> --
> Dennis Groves <http://about.me/dennis.groves>, MSc
> dennis.groves at owasp.org <mailto:dennis.groves at owasp.org>
>
> <http://www.owasp.org/>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Christian Heinrich
> <christian.heinrich at owasp.org
> <mailto:christian.heinrich at owasp.org>> wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Chris Schmidt
> <chris.schmidt at owasp.org <mailto:chris.schmidt at owasp.org>> wrote:
> > Christian - your points are completely aside from the point
> of my
> > e-mail. I don't care where they got their facts and I don't
> care what
> > Tom did or did not do, this is not the place for such
> discussions. The
> > fact of the matter is that OWASP needs to inform Gawker that
> he is *not*
> > an OWASP board member so they can redact that part of the
> article for
> > sake of people that are *not* Gawker and *not* Tom, and
> *not* us. This
> > is not an attack on Tom, it is a reaction to a statement
> made in an
> > article that is incorrect that needs to be corrected, that
> is all -
> > please do not turn this into something else.
>
> You haven't considered that Gawker issuing a clarification as "Tom
> Ryan is a former Board Member of the OWASP NYC/NJ Chapter"
> would make
> this worst for OWASP by naming the OWASP NYC/NJ Chapter?
>
> In the end, it doesn't matter what your intention is because their
> (i.e. media) agenda is continue this story based on emotive
> reaction
> (it is Gawker btw) and if this is clarified then their journalists
> would attend https://www.owasp.org/index.php/NYNJMetro and ask the
> attendees for their uninformed comment who then subsequently find
> themselves also as victims as being cited as sources of fact.
>
> If they contact you it is best to say "no comment" and hang up
> the phone.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Christian Heinrich
> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/user:cmlh
> _______________________________________________
> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
> <mailto:OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org>
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org <mailto:OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org>
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/stephencraigevans
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20111016/e9fa1731/attachment.html
More information about the OWASP-Leaders
mailing list