[Owasp-leaders] Fwd: Your message to Global_chapter_committeeawaits moderator approval

Matthew Chalmers matthew.chalmers at owasp.org
Thu Feb 17 17:16:00 EST 2011


There's an infrastructure team?

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Jason Li <jason.li at owasp.org> wrote:

> I've raised this specific concern with the infrastructure team. The hope is
> that any solution we come up with will essentially be transparent to current
> mailing lists in the sense that post-cutover, people can continue using
> existing mailing list aliases.
>
> Obviously that presents a great technical challenge that we may have to
> back away from, but for now that is the goal.
>
> I understand everyone's eagerness to migrate to forums - I've personally
> been for message forums since the 2008 Summit when they were suggested as
> part of the Website Working Session.
>
> As you can tell by this and previous threads, it's not as simple as just
> standing up forums and cutting loose the mailing lists.
>
> But we will get this done!
>
> -Jason
>
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Paulo Coimbra <pcoimbra at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> Have we thought about the impact on Projects? We have almost 1.5 hundred
>> of them, each one with its own mailing list containing a significant number
>> of subscribers. In our Chapters, I believe, similar question applies.
>>
>> Paulo
>>
>> On 17 de Fev de 2011, at 21:43, Matthew Chalmers <
>> matthew.chalmers at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>> Is there a target date? I want to put it on my wall calendar and count
>> down the days...
>>
>> -chalmers
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Laurence Casey <<larry.casey at aspectsecurity.com>
>> larry.casey at aspectsecurity.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This topic was discussed in great detail at the summit. The outcome from
>>> the meeting was that as long as the forum can run as a forum and act like a
>>> mailing list, it will be implemented. I am all for forum’s, but can
>>> appreciate others point of view. So the goal is to move to forums and nobody
>>> will know the difference other than we will have way more visibility and
>>> functionality.
>>>
>>> --Larry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* <owasp-leaders-bounces at lists.owasp.org>
>>> owasp-leaders-bounces at lists.owasp.org [mailto:<owasp-leaders-bounces at lists.owasp.org>
>>> owasp-leaders-bounces at lists.owasp.org] *On Behalf Of *Matthew Chalmers
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 17, 2011 4:29 PM
>>> *To:* <owasp-leaders at lists.owasp.org>owasp-leaders at lists.owasp.org
>>> *Subject:* [Owasp-leaders] Fwd: Your message to
>>> Global_chapter_committeeawaits moderator approval
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I just wanted to point this out as a good reason to move from archaic
>>> mailman lists to forums (see below). Since all our mailman lists are managed
>>> by different people, they're all configured differently. Apparently I can't
>>> even email the committee to which I belong under certain circumstances.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have a feeling that the forums idea will fade away just like last time,
>>> however, because it's not clear who has the authority to decide if it will
>>> be implemented, and very few people (perhaps only one) have the technical
>>> ability (access) to implement it, authorized or not.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -chalmers
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: < <global_chapter_committee-bounces at lists.owasp.org>
>>> global_chapter_committee-bounces at lists.owasp.org>
>>> Date: Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:12 PM
>>> Subject: Your message to Global_chapter_committee awaits moderator
>>> approval
>>> To: <matthew.chalmers at owasp.org>matthew.chalmers at owasp.org
>>>
>>>
>>> Your mail to 'Global_chapter_committee' with the subject
>>>
>>>    Re: [Global_chapter_committee] [Owasp-board] Results of Feb GCC
>>> Action items from the board
>>>
>>> Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
>>>
>>> The reason it is being held:
>>>
>>>    Too many recipients to the message
>>>
>>> Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
>>> notification of the moderator's decision.  If you would like to cancel
>>> this posting, please visit the following URL:
>>>
>>>    <https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/confirm/global_chapter_committee/dc221a013639b3472535606c7fdb2ab147f6df6f>
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/confirm/global_chapter_committee/dc221a013639b3472535606c7fdb2ab147f6df6f
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>>>  <OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org>OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
>>>  <https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders>
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20110217/6cd863c2/attachment.html 


More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list