[Owasp-leaders] Creative Commons: BY-SA or just BY

Jeff Williams jeff.williams at owasp.org
Mon Nov 1 07:25:35 EDT 2010

By SA encourages contribution.  I think it's totally appropriate for the material in the wiki.  Changing it at this point may be impossible anyway.  For the software projects, we always leave the particular open source license up to the project lead.  For the wiki it really needs to be one license.


On Nov 1, 2010, at 4:16 AM, dinis cruz <dinis.cruz at owasp.org> wrote:

> I have some worries that the OWASP use of a BY-SA Creative Commons License is being a limitation on the use of OWASP materials by the industry and governments.
> Wouldn't a BY Creative Commons License be much more friendly and promote the wide use of our content?
> The BY-SA CC 3.0 License (see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) is a 'Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported' License that requires attribution to OWASP AND release or remixed materials under a similar license (i.e. it has a 'viral' component which has some positive effects but creates a number of scenarios where it will not be used)
> The BY CC 3.0 License (see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0) is a 'Attribution 3.0 Unported' License that only requires attribution to OWASP.
> According to our WIKI we are currently using the BY-SA but shouldn't we move to a BY license?
> Dinis Cruz
> _______________________________________________
> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20101101/ff3ba32d/attachment.html 

More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list