[Owasp-leaders] Creative Commons: BY-SA or just BY

Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman buanzo at buanzo.com.ar
Mon Nov 1 07:14:54 EDT 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 11/01/2010 05:16 AM, dinis cruz wrote:
> The BY-SA CC 3.0 License
> (see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) is a*
> 'Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported' *License that requires attribution
> to OWASP *AND* release or remixed materials under a similar license
> (i.e. it has a 'viral' component which has some positive effects but
> creates a number of scenarios where it will not be used)

I think we should use BY-SA. Do we want OWASP-produced material to be closed by a 3rd party? After
all, we are the *Open* Web Application Security Project. I might be confused, of course.

- -- 
Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman :.
Independent Linux and Security Consultant - OWASP - SANS - OISSG .
http://www.buanzo.com.ar/pro/eng.html                           ..:
http://www.cervezacicuta.com.ar - "LA" Cerveza Artesanal de Villa Bosch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEAREKAAYFAkzOoS4ACgkQAlpOsGhXcE0iqACdGX7Hf14kaxisa9X+z12Ixi+F
qWcAnjvhH2/cy1O8qH+15vDaX3VpYP/Y
=ZME9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list