[Owasp-leaders] Creative Commons: BY-SA or just BY

dinis cruz dinis.cruz at owasp.org
Mon Nov 1 04:16:43 EDT 2010


I have some worries that the OWASP use of a BY-SA Creative Commons License
is being a limitation on the use of OWASP materials by the industry and
governments.

Wouldn't a BY Creative Commons License be much more friendly and promote the
wide use of our content?

The BY-SA CC 3.0 License (see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/)
is a* 'Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported' *License that requires
attribution to OWASP *AND* release or remixed materials under a similar
license (i.e. it has a 'viral' component which has some positive effects but
creates a number of scenarios where it will not be used)

The BY CC 3.0 License (see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0) is a
*'Attribution 3.0 Unported'* License that only requires attribution to
OWASP.

According to our WIKI we are currently using the BY-SA but shouldn't we move
to a BY license?

Dinis Cruz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20101101/83da2899/attachment.html 


More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list