[Owasp-leaders] RFC: Two proposed next tweaks to the services registry
mike.boberski at gmail.com
Mon May 31 16:02:16 EDT 2010
The results of the survey are in! Thank you for taking the time.
It was a toss-up on the question of whether to include descriptions of
approaches to performing a given service. So, the requirement has been
removed for now, we can always revisit this and other items later on.
It was not a toss-up on the name change, there was an overwhelming response
to leave it named "commercial services". So, the name stays for now, we can
always revisit this and other items later on.
Please do forward any additional suggestions for improvement. I think this
approach worked well, batching them up and creating a survey, to gather
To be listed in the OWASP Commercial Services Registry, contact Kate
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Boberski, Michael [USA] <
boberski_michael at bah.com> wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
> As you know, I have been working on the OWASP commercial services
> registry/commercial services board.
> We’re basically shooting for a phone book that’s sorted according to some
> OWASP artifacts as they are currently categorized, to try to nudge the
> planet along in adoption of them, to get consumers of services of those
> types to ask for them, by making it easy to find such service providers.
> Towards the end of continuing its development, there are a next set of
> proposed updates that we would like your opinion on. A survey has been setup
> here: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/9JDN98P If you can spare a few
> minutes to provide your input, it would be appreciated. The cutoff date is
> the end of the week.
> Mike B.
> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OWASP-Leaders