[Owasp-leaders] RFC: Two proposed next tweaks to the services registry
john.wilander at owasp.org
Mon May 24 14:44:17 EDT 2010
Hi Michael (and the rest of the leaders)!
I'm sorry but I don't understand what you mean by "OWASP commercial services
registry provider listings are currently required to provide information
that includes descriptions of approaches to performing a given service."
Does "listings are currently required to provide information" mean "the list
has to include certain information about each provider"?
What are "descriptions of approaches"?
Could you given an example of a "given service"?
I'm not a native English speaker I'm afraid. Sorry.
2010/5/24 Boberski, Michael [USA] <boberski_michael at bah.com>
> Dear Colleagues,
> As you know, I have been working on the OWASP commercial services
> registry/commercial services board.
> We’re basically shooting for a phone book that’s sorted according to some
> OWASP artifacts as they are currently categorized, to try to nudge the
> planet along in adoption of them, to get consumers of services of those
> types to ask for them, by making it easy to find such service providers.
> Towards the end of continuing its development, there are a next set of
> proposed updates that we would like your opinion on. A survey has been setup
> here: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/9JDN98P If you can spare a few
> minutes to provide your input, it would be appreciated. The cutoff date is
> the end of the week.
> Mike B.
> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
Chapter leader OWASP Sweden, http://owaspsweden.blogspot.com
Conference chair OWASP AppSec Research 2010, http://owasp.se
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OWASP-Leaders