[Owasp-leaders] Zed Attack Proxy slides

psiinon psiinon at gmail.com
Fri Dec 3 08:24:18 EST 2010


And heres the proposed flyer - again all feedback appreciated.
I couldnt find a template for this, so I just ripped off the look and
feel of the 'Secure Coding Practices' one.

Cheers

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:54 PM, psiinon <psiinon at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Paulo,
>
> Yes, you can upload the slides, although obviously they might change.
>
> The meeting is documented on the Leeds UK chapter page:
> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Leeds_UK
> Hopefully thats enough info for you?
>
> I'll let you know as soon as the new release is available - it will be
> called "1.1.0" and yes, I think a a Stable status would be a good
> target.
> And if you could set up the new links/templates now that would be great.
>
> Yiannis has offered to review ZAP (unless you've changed your mind Yiannis?;)
>
> I'm happy to stick with the old logo for this release and then use
> whatever logo is agreed to be most suitable.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Paulo Coimbra <paulo.coimbra at owasp.org> wrote:
>> Hello S.,
>>
>>
>>
>> Can I upload the slides? We can do it now and later on again if you decide a
>> revision of them in function of received feedback.
>>
>>
>>
>> As for the Global OWASP Events page, I can pleasantly do it and announce
>> ZAP’s new version – please send me the details off.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regarding the release’s OWASP branded status, as we have the concept not
>> sufficiently clarified and institutionalized yet, I suggest we target Stable
>> status.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Tool_Assessment_Criteria
>>
>>
>>
>> Please let me know both if you want me to set up the links/templates to host
>> the new release (if yes, please let me know its designation/name) and, if
>> you accept my suggestion for us to assess the release, whether you can point
>> a reviewer out.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Assessing_Project_Releases#Prerequisites_for_Project_Release__Assessment
>>
>>
>>
>> To conclude, I propose the logo’s design work only be finished after the
>> release’s assessment is concluded so that it can include the mention ‘OWASP
>> Project’. Jason, Jeff and Dinis had also taken position about this and so
>> their opinion would be helpful.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> - Paulo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Paulo Coimbra,
>>
>> OWASP Project Manager
>>
>>
>>
>> From: owasp-leaders-bounces at lists.owasp.org
>> [mailto:owasp-leaders-bounces at lists.owasp.org] On Behalf Of psiinon
>> Sent: quinta-feira, 2 de Dezembro de 2010 15:26
>> To: owasp-leaders at lists.owasp.org
>> Subject: [Owasp-leaders] Zed Attack Proxy slides
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm giving a talk about OWASP ZAP at a local OWASP meeting, so I thought I'd
>> better do some slides:) So please see the attached 'conference style' slides
>> for ZAP.
>>
>> All feedback gratefully received.
>>
>>
>>
>> Note that these are really aiming ZAP at developers, whereas I know of
>> various pen testers who now use it.
>>
>> My reasoning is that pen testers will probably try out new tools anyway,
>> while developers might need a bit more of a push.
>>
>> Again, any feedback on this approach would also be great.
>>
>>
>>
>> btw does anyone know how to get the event added to the 'Global OWASP Events'
>> on the OWASP front page?
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm also planning to do another ZAP release this weekend, which will be the
>> first 'OWASP branded' version.
>>
>> Do I need to follow any 'standard' (or recommended) procedures for this?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> Psiinon
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OWASP ZAP Flyer.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 52116 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/attachments/20101203/a02fda2a/attachment-0001.pdf 


More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list