Thu Nov 13 15:28:43 EST 2008
statically or using a shared library, the combination of the two is legally
speaking a combined work, a derivative of the original library. The ordinary
General Public License therefore permits such linking only if the entire
combination fits its criteria of freedom. The Lesser General Public License
permits more lax criteria for linking other code with the library."
If you use oPortal, then everything that uses it must be released under GPL.
The alternatives are to issue oPortal under the LGPL or another less viral
license, or issue a specific license to Aral allowing him to do what he
wants -- perhaps in return for something.
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Curphey
To: 'Aral Balkan' ; owasp-leaders at lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 9:17 AM
Subject: [OWASP-LEADERS] RE: License question
I am not a licensing expert but I know we have some people on the project
who are pretty well up on this sort of thing. Guys, any comments ?
From: Aral Balkan [mailto:aral at bitsandpixels.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 5:54 AM
To: owasp at owasp.org
I believe I have a firm grasp of the GPL license as it pertains to software
itself, however in this case, if we were to use oPortal, could custom
portlets that we create have to be released under GPL? Would a site that
uses oPortal come under GPL?
___( Aral Balkan )_____________________________________________
Managing Director.. Bits & Pixels : www.BitsAndPixels.co.uk
Dir. Ed. Content... Ultrashock : www.Ultrashock.com
Author............. Friends of ED : www.FriendsOfEd.com
Macromedia DevNet : www.macromedia.com/devnet
Director........... London MMUG : www.mmug.co.uk
More information about the OWASP-Leaders