[OWASP-LEADERS] Licensing for Filters / OCL

Sverre H. Huseby shh at thathost.com
Tue Jun 24 14:24:47 EDT 2003


[Gabriel Lawrence]

|   I see the point to using things like GPL in cases where extending
|   or using the library isn't the end goal. So, I like GPL for
|   applications and LGPL for libraries.

I agree.  GPL on an application doesn't stop anyone from using that
application.  GPL on a library, on the other hand, may easily stop
people from using the library.

If I understand correctly, a major goal for OWASP is to help people
create secure web applications.  Unless promoting (radical) free
software politics is also high on the OWASP list, my personal opinion
is that LGPL (or similar) is much better suited than GPL for the OWASP
_libraries_.  No need to force people to GPL their applications as
long as the OWASP librares themselves stays free.


Sverre.

-- 
shh at thathost.com
http://shh.thathost.com/




More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list