[OWASP-LEADERS] Owasp project standards
david.raphael at ceterum.net
Sun Feb 16 11:33:09 EST 2003
Wow! This is great.
I have a few questions:
1. You make a comment regarding testing and formalization of the
testing tool. Is there going to be a practices document for each
project? Or is it just like: "Hey everyone, we will use JUnit"
2. I know that this issue is close to my heart, and Ingo and I have
discussed this extensively:
"Aspects of importance are in the following order from highest
importance to least importance: correct operation, security, code
readability, ease of use, portability, efficiency, power, and features."
My question is this: Where does performance fall in this?
Everything else looks great!
On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 10:31 PM, Manavendra Gupta wrote:
> Please find attached the Owasp project standards document. This is a
> work in progress, and as you'd see a lot of meat of the document is
> In all honesty, I did try to use DocBook with XMLSpy to get on with
> the document, but I lost close to 3 days finding my way around it (and
> I must admit I'm not good at it still).
> I have certain artificats ready (such as the delivery control
> checklist, code review checklist, etc), but I will need another day to
> integrate them with this document.
> I shall be able to spend a lot more time over the course of next week,
> so hopefully, the progress will be much faster.
> Please review the document and email me your comments/suggestions.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 1732 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/private/owasp-leaders/attachments/20030216/cb8e804d/attachment.bin
More information about the OWASP-Leaders