[OWASP-LEADERS] Food for thought - Web Browser compatibility

Alex Russell alex at netWindows.org
Tue Apr 8 12:54:40 EDT 2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 08 April 2003 11:47 am, David Raphael wrote:
> However, do you support 90%? or 100%?  I am leaning towards 100%.  I am
> just imagining how many Sun Workstations are running Netscape 4.xx.
> and those are J2EE developers that are going to be very unhappy with no
> NS4 support.

I'm not saying we shouldn't "support" it, but rather that jumping through 
non-standard hoops to make things look good or to provide above-average 
functionality to NN4 is a waste of time, and very likely a mistake.

> We can support NS4.  But the question is should we?

Not explicitly, no. Give NN4 the "degraded" version. The site degrades, 
right?

- -- 
Alex Russell
alex at netWindows.org
alex at SecurePipe.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+kv7ZoV0dQ6uSmkYRApJoAJ4ldbJQtugCNzIfAZcd+r9wae13gQCgowWw
15mS68eoge7nii48rwxeyAU=
=w6tN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the OWASP-Leaders mailing list