[Owasp-guide] AUTHOR ACTION REQUIRED -- REVISED OUTLINE (RESEND)
Boberski, Michael [USA]
boberski_michael at bah.com
Mon Apr 19 15:35:15 EDT 2010
Not really, it means after you understand what you need in more detail, it will make choices like using ESAPI or some other solution more clear.
From: Eoin [mailto:eoinkeary at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 3:32 PM
To: Tom Stripling
Cc: owasp-guide at lists.owasp.org; Boberski, Michael [USA]
Subject: Re: [Owasp-guide] AUTHOR ACTION REQUIRED -- REVISED OUTLINE (RESEND)
Build or buy, this really means build but you ar'nt building but hoping someone else has built it properly ;)
On Apr 19, 2010 5:22 p.m., "Tom Stripling" <tstripling at appsecconsulting.com<mailto:tstripling at appsecconsulting.com>> wrote:
Right, so it turns out that when you mess up a Gmail filter, you end up
dumping everything straight into the archive instead of the folder where you
thought it was going. I haven't gotten any of these emails in the past 3
weeks. I thought the list was rather quiet...
I'm going to get on this now, but I want to understand it better to make
sure I get it right. You're saying the top-level outline should be "Build
or buy?" and then each subsection? That seems somewhat unnecessary to me.
Why not just have "worksheets" and "see also" be peers to each subsection
# OWASP-0500 Input Validation
* OWASP-0502 Verify that a positive validation pattern is defined and applied to all input. ...
Also, am I correct in understanding that this would mean we could
potentially have a single worksheet for an entire section?
Thanks and sorry again for the delay.
-----Original Message----- From: owasp-guide-bounces at lists.owasp.org<mailto:owasp-guide-bounces at lists.owasp.org> [mailto:owasp-guide-bounces at l.<mailto:owasp-guide-bounces at l.>..
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-guide