[OWASP-GUIDE] Guide V2 - A time for action
mark at curphey.com
Fri Mar 14 13:45:46 EST 2003
Agreed. As we don't have any more for now I think it may be the majority
for this version though.
On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 10:40, Alex Russell wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Mark Curphey wrote:
> > Would have to disagree I am afraid. Its being widely implemented,
> > supported by IE and Netscape and a W3C standard. No ones saying thats
> > all that should be in privacy. If someone wants to write more than have
> > at it. Tim Smiths P3P write up so far is all we have.
> > It was assigned as a task a while back and this is the first complaint
> > (I think?) so I would vote that it stays.
> I'm not saying it should go, but that P3P should be but a part of a
> larger privacy chapter. That's all.
Mark Curphey <mark at curphey.com>
More information about the Owasp-guide